First, I started in September 2015 to prepare for 803--, which is the computer science and technology major . Now smoothed the plan, I was the review of each of the subjects were divided into three paragraphs: the first stage, combined with the review of all the knowledge of the teaching materials to all-round scanning, fully understand and understand, in fact, follow the
Through this class library, you can automatically analyze the input content and give a score. The program can determine whether the content has reached a certain sensitivity level based on this score, so as to perform corresponding automatic processing.
If such a database is combined with a manual review, the results will be very good: the suspicious content of the server review is automatically submitted
First, describe it, And then summarize it, and finally design and implement it.
Statement:
1. Save the documents to be submitted.
After the operator makes a ticket, he may go to the toilet. He is in a hurry. Just as he writes a ticket on paper, he has not confirmed that the ticket should be sent to the superior leadership for review.
2. Submitted by the operator, indicating that the documents can be reviewed and self-reviewed.
3. The first
Gerrit code review server workflow and principles the Google Android open-source project has two important innovations in the use of git. One is the repo introduced for multi-version library collaboration, we have discussed this in detail before. Another important innovation is Gerrit, the code review server. Gerrit is mandatory for the code review introduced by
Personally understood, code review has two functions:
1. Two people are always more thoughtful than one person, looking at the angle of the problem it is easier to find bugs or find simpler and more effective solutions. The so-called onlooker sees most is the truth.
2. Ideally everyone in the team is familiar with every part of the project, but when the project is large it is not realistic, and the code review
Programmer's top ten troubles-csdn. Net http://www.csdn.net/article/2012-11-22/2812154-Ten-Trouble-Programmers
Question and counterargument to several traditional ideas of software development-csdn. Net http://www.csdn.net/article/2012-11-21/2812095-Software-Development
20 common code traps have you been shot? -Csdn. Net http://www.csdn.net/article/2012-11-19/2811978-20-All-Too-Common-Coding-Pitfalls-For-Be
[Discussion] Code Review: is it a good idea
Software Review
The software review is not reviewed after the software development is completed, but is reviewed at all stages of the software development. Because errors may occur at all stages of software development. If these errors are not found and corrected in time, they will be constantly expanded, which may lead to uncontrollable development results.
Software
developers tempted users to perform fraudulent IAP. In fact, there is indeed a malicious in-app payment phenomenon.
Currently, the in-APP purchase specification is a good third-party specification for users and developers, and apple. Although Apple's policy is tough and sometimes unfriendly, its strict review standards are indeed justified in the Dropbox incident. But why does most media think this is an audit error, or even Apple's intention? There
Design reviews are an important part of the design process. It is a part of the design process that cannot be overlooked, whether in an independent design team, or in a mobile or remote design group. Through the team design review, in different members of the review, comments to get feedback, so that you stand outside the perspective of the previous design works, so you can better make design decisions, ove
Reprint Test Case ReviewThe first thing to know is the definition of internal review, the internal review of the Test team, or the review within the project team. The review is defined differently and the content is not the same.I. Review classification: Test group Internal
The Sprint Review Conference has long been an important part of scrum, a mechanism for the team to get feedback on the product increments that are delivered by the iteration. At the Sprint review meeting, the product owner determines the priority of the next sprint's requirements based on the feedback received.So, is the sprint review now obsolete?Ten years ago,
Why code Review is requiredRecently read some articles, found that some of the ideas of agile development more and more teams in practice, also feel that agile is no longer as early as the time so virtual, there are many tools to embody this concept emerges. Among them, "How to improve the quality of code" has been a lot of discussion, agile development also has a good variety of proposals, the most well-known, but also the most unreliable should be p
This article organizes the basic process of submitting code to the OpenStack community, as well as some information about the community. If there is reprint, please indicate the source!Let's take a picture to illustrate the general flow of OpenStack code review:The process for submitting code changes to OpenStack is mainly as follows:
Configuring Git and Gerrit Environments
Clone the code of the target project and make changes on the new branch
Commit to a local repo and push it
1. Tencent video Upload review process:After uploading a video, you need to wait for transcoding and review. The following steps are required for a video to be uploaded and published:1. Upload a video: enter the title, tag, category, and description of the video. You cannot close the upload page before prompting you to upload the video successfully;2. Transcoding: After the upload is complete, the server ne
Use LaravelModeration extension to implement a simple content review system in Laravel applications
1. Introduction
Laravel Moderation is based on Laravel 5. * The implemented simple content review system allows or rejects requests to application resources, such as articles, comments, and users, in order to keep the app Pure by blocking content that is offensive, offensive, or insulting. Simply put, it is
Chen nengtech
2007-9-20
Original article:"44" metrics for test case review without tiveness-http://davidfrico.com/roi-metrics-f.htm
1. Major defects per test case reviewMajor defects found in each reviewed test case2. minor defects per test case reviewSecondary defects discovered in each reviewed test case
3. Total defects per test case reviewTotal number of defects discovered in each reviewed test case
4. Ratio of major to minor defects per test cas
In the area of software development, code review appears to be a controversial, fairly peaceful topic.
The prevailing view is that code censorship is a good thing. Some companies or organizations even force the requirement to audit the code as a necessary process.
Review is a good measure to catch bugs and problems. The ability to share domain knowledge and improve code quality through code reviews. Code
How to improve Team productivity
In the fast-paced work, the team can often stop to reflect on the progress of the current work by means of "retrospective meeting", and find out what improvements to make based on the results of introspection. How can you better carry out a regular review meeting that will enable the team to continuously improve their work efficiency? Let's start with four simple questions ...
How to play the greatest value of
Peer review is a peer review process, where an author's academic work or plan is reviewed by other experts and scholars in the same field. In the publishing unit mainly peer-reviewed method to select and screening of the delivered manuscript acceptance or not, and the funds provided by the unit, but also in a peer-reviewed manner to determine whether the grant of research fellowships.1 ConceptsThe peer-revi
Code review ensures that
Code Quality is an important part. Its main work is:
1. Discover bugs in the Code;
2. Check the code quality from the perspective of code maintainability and scalability, and propose suggestions for modification.
1. bugs in the Code mainly appear in the following two places:(1) bugs unrelated to business logic.For example, the stream, file, and connection opened in the system are not closed in time, thread safe problems e
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.