udacity review

Tag:getnaviginpuica not .sorgba program app rejected First, the introduction of expedited audit1, the general 50% of the application will be within 24h of the audit, more than 90% of the application within the radius of H have beenaudited. It also means that, from submission to review, there may be a whole day, and if it's a weekend (US time weekend), the time may be longer. However, if you have special circumstances, such as: The app has a serious

Introduced: In agile software development, the speed of code generation is much higher than that of traditional waterfall. Because we have made the time more compact. How can so much code guarantee the quality of the code? Many people may think directly of static code detection tools. Yes, those are the ones that can define a code-checking rule to ensure the quality of the code, but is that just from the language point of view, is the logic optimized? Has reusability been optimized to the extre

As we all know, the postgraduate entrance exam is a systematic and massive project that needs to be fully grasped. In this year or half a year, how do I organize my own review plan? How can I effectively manage my review time? How can we greatly improve learning efficiency through scientific review planning and time management? These are undoubtedly the most impo

Address: http://www.phabricator.com/docs/phabricator/article/Audit_User_Guide.html OverviewPhabricator supports two code review workflows: Review (pre-submission review) and Audit (post-Submission review ).This document outlines the post-Submission review process using the a

Code ReviewI have been doing software development for more than three years. My team has also used various Code quality control methods. I personally think Code Review is the most effective method, it is also the most cost-effective code quality control method. I will summarize some of my views and opinions. What is Code Review? Code Review Chinese translation me

Lesson 1 Spring Ice and Snow melted seeds sprout fruit trees blossom We came to the river, to the field, to the mountain. We found spring 1980s primary school textbook Review Lesson 2 peach blossom apple blossom Many fruit trees are planted in our village. It's spring, the trees are all flowers, and our village is a garden. In the fall, the tree filled with fruit, and our village became an orchard. 1980s primary school textbook

Reprint: http://blog.csdn.net/huachao1001/article/details/53156582In October, no longer participate in the school recruit, the interview process is really tired, sometimes on-site interview is a few hours. In addition to the pressure of graduation thesis, so did not continue to participate in the company's pen interview. Over the past few months, the review also used to search for information, search the real problem. After all, from small to large ex

Design reviews are an important part of the design process. It is a part of the design process that cannot be overlooked, whether in an independent design team, or in a mobile or remote design group. Through the team design review, in different members of the review, comments to get feedback, so that you stand outside the perspective of the previous design works, so you can better make design decisions, ove

This tweet is a former colleague to share the time of the PPT, here I sorted out to share to everyone What is code review?Code review is a quality assurance mechanism that verifies code implementation by systematically checking the source code during the software development process.Why not do code review? Business needs are big and working hours ar

[C #] C # basic review,C # basic review-anonymous method directory Introduction Use range of parameters for anonymous methods Delegation example Introduction In versions earlier than C #2.0, we create the unique form of delegation-naming method. C #2.0 -- the anonymous method is introduced. In a version ≥c #3.0, we replace the anonymous method with a Lambda expression, lambda expressions are also the p

In scrum, The Sprint plan meeting is the most important event, and the second important event is the review meeting, because this is the best time for the team to make improvements. If you do not review it, you will find that the team is making the same mistake again. After the sprint review meeting, the team needs to hold a