upsource code review

basis of anti-code and get the correct result? 2-1=2+ (-1) = [0000 0010] Original + [1000 0001] original = [0000 0010] Complement + [1111 1111] Complement If you take [1111 1111] as the original code, remove the sign bit, then: [0111 1111] Original = 127 In fact, on the basis of anti-code +1, just equivalent to increase the value of t

1. Jupiter is an open source Eclipse code review plugin that stores review data in XML form. 2. Review data needs to be passed in the version control System (CVS/SVN). 3, three stages: individual review stage (individual Phase), team

Code reviews are one of the most important ways to eliminate bugs, which are especially effective in most cases. Because the code review itself targets objects, it is to overlook the problems and bugs of the entire code in the test process. In addition, code

Data API and background data synchronization have been completed. I did not care about this part in about two days. Code Mainly because the products and bosses are not very active. Because this is not very important after all. Today, I reviewed the code and made some repairs, such as naming conventions and code logic, and made the

CodeThis topic of readability has always received much attention, but there is no unified standard for its high readability and low readability. After all, the specifications of various companies and even projects are different. We can't say that a code that is extremely abstract and flexible but hard to understand for ten days and a half is highly readable, it cannot be said that the readability of a code

If you already have internal expertise, WAF seems a simple choice to meet your compliance requirements. But for IT security, there will never be such a simple method. For example, Web Application Firewall cannot prevent damages caused by logical defects of applications. Today's Web 2.0 applications use a lot of dynamic code. Considering the complexity of these Web 2.0 applications, logical defects can easily happen.In the face of this situation, the b

Remember the last time review Board This online code review tool was a year ago, when the review Board version was 1.0.3; A colleague from the department is also tossing review Board, but now the version has been upgraded to 1.5.1. The new version of

Everyone acknowledges that Code Review is costly and time-consuming, especially when software projects are sent to the software testing department. For some developers, it will lead to more office politics and gossip. A code review may gradually improve the code. If you thin

things.Other FAQsImportantData type issues:(1) Is there an error in the data type of the variable?(2) Are there assignments of different data types?(3) Is there a comparison of different data types?ImportantVariable Value problem:(1) Is there an error in the initialization or default value of the variable?(2) Are there overflow or underflow of variables?(3) is the accuracy of the variable sufficient?ImportantLogical judgment Question:(1) is the comparison invalid due to the accuracy reason?(2)

1. Code specificationI think the code specification is necessary, and I would like to present my own rebuttal to the following four points: These norms are the result of a bureaucratic system that wastes everyone's programming time, affects people's development efficiency, and wastes time. The first thing you should know is, what is the code specification

In the development process, many teams use code reviews or code Review to ensure code quality. Generally, code Review uses a collective Review. Collective

Original ENGLISHOriginal post address In the previous articleArticleAs mentioned in, I am no longer working in Google. I have not figured out where to go-there are two or three very good job opportunities in front of me. Because during this decision period, I was no longer employed by anyone. I wanted to write something professional, something interesting, however, it also causes tension between colleagues and management work. Google is a very good company. They have made a lot of commendabl

Several practices of code Review Mao was published 4 years ago in programming technology Code view everyone who reads the article will know what it means. Our project is also sticking to the code view. Today we take a closer look at the connotation and role of Code view. Ov

#include count=0;While [$C-le 100];Do touch ' wz$count ' doneLS TEST?LS test*LS Test[2-5]LS test[2-100] Only test0//errorLS test[0-9]9 test9 test19 test29Date +%y-%m-%d%h-%m-%smytime=$ (date +%y-%m-%d%h-%m-%s)Mytime= ' Date +%y-%m-%d%h-%m-%s 'Echo MyTimeInt=123echo $int + $int #123 +123echo $ (int+int) #246echo $ ($int + $int) #246((Data=int+int))echo Data #246Touch $ $Touch $\ $Touch \$\ \$Touch-fileTouch \-fileTouch./-fileRm-f./-fileTouch---FileRM---File' and ' "gg=100echo "\% \ \" $gg ' ls '

Chapter 2 Collaborative construction talked about review and inspection, which resonated with each other and reminded me of the good time I spent working in my company. In the company, project code is common, and it is no exception to our part-time students. The first thing to do at work every day is to update and retrieve the latest code base from depot (we cal

Because our team now uses Crucible as a code review tool, I asked my colleagues to study the use of this tool, and this is the result of his research, and I just translated it in Chinese: Examples, such as the one named Charles Wang, examine the code written by Kevin Qian. For author Author: (1) Login Code

Individuals write their own code without a review process, which is indeed faster. Developers will naturally like and have this kind of preference, because it feels free and there are some ugly places that will not be seen by others... However, if a program is maintained by many people and requires high quality and stability, code

1. Purpose of code reviewCode review is a process of improving code quality by reviewing code. It plays an extremely important role in the XP method. Code review mainly achieves the following objectives:1). Improve

I remember when I first started my project at the company, mentor wanted to check some of the code I just implemented with me. At that time, I was puzzled. Didn't I trust the code I wrote? It turns out that my code has many defects, some of which are still very serious. Later, I learned that this process is called code

Recently, a friend's company wants to find someone to develop a futures trading system suitable for his company, but I am afraid that people may put some backdoor code in the Program (for fear that people may steal company's confidential files, accounts, funds, etc.), so I would like to ask a team to review the code before the program is put into use, check wheth