vlc equalizer

Win under the server Tomcat check to detect if the Tomcat port is hanging off, if the automatic restart is suspended. The script is as follows#include ; Tomcat Directory$tomcatDir = "C:\ovk\apache-tomcat-7.0.55\bin\"; VLC Directory$vlcPath = "C:\Program Files\videolan\vlc\vlc.exe"; Self Channel 1 file filename must be ziban1.ts$ziban 1Path = "C:\pingdao\ziban1.ts", Self Channel 1 multicast address$ziban 1De

plugin) RTMP_SAMPLE_PLAYER_VIDEOJS: Videojs-based rtmp/http player Rtmp_sample_player_jwplayer: Jwplayer-based rtmp/http player Hls_sample_player_flowplayer: FlowPlayer-based HLS player (add HLS plugin) HLS_VIDEO_PLAYER_HTML5: HTML5-based hls/http player Activex_vlc_player: The player for the VLC-based ActiveX control rtmp sample player Adobe rtmp sample player Adobe is a Test player extracted from Adobe Flash Media Sever, wh

The adapter mode (Adapter pattern) is a bridge between two incompatible interfaces. This type of design pattern belongs to the structural pattern, which combines the functions of two separate interfaces.This pattern involves a single class that is responsible for adding standalone or incompatible interface functions. As a real example, the card reader is the adapter between the memory card and the notebook. You insert the memory card into the card reader and then insert the card reader into the

Http://www.cnblogs.com/evan-cai/archive/2013/01/25/2876803.html Write a cross-platform player with Cocos2d-x and libvlc Introduction: This article uses cocos2d-x and libvlc two free open-source cross-platform framework, to achieve a video player. Visual Studio 2010 is used as a development tool and the testing platform is Windows (other platforms are not tested yet ). Cocos2d-x version 2.0.3, VLC version 2.0.5. Currently, most game developers deve

. Theshortest expected delay of SED . In fact, SED is similar to WLC, except that the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the

fact, SED is similar to WLC, except that the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer dire

the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without

considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without the SED calculation.9,LBLC based on the l

them:First, the advantages of LVS:1, strong anti-load ability, because the LVS work mode logic is very simple, and work in the Network 4 layer only to do the request for distribution, no traffic, so in the efficiency of the basic need not too much consideration. In my hand, the LVS, just once the problem: in the concurrency of the highest period of time the equalizer packet loss, according to the analysis of network problems, that is, Nic or linux2.4

Comparison of load balance between LVS, Haproxy and NginxFrom the performance and stability of the most bull LVs, basically reached the F5 hardware equipment 60% performance, a few other 10% are a bit difficult. But because of the LVS bull, configuration is the most troublesome, and health testing needs to be configured Ldirector, other haproxy and nginx themselves, and the configuration super simple.If the site visits are not portal level with haproxy or nginx OK, to the portal level in the use

your knowledge and level of technology.Here's a look at both of them:First, the advantages of LVS:1, strong anti-load ability, because the LVS work mode logic is very simple, and work in the Network 4 layer only to do the request for distribution, no traffic, so in the efficiency of the basic need not too much consideration. In my hand, the LVS, just once the problem: in the concurrency of the highest period of time the equalizer packet loss, accordi

them:First, the advantages of LVS:1, strong anti-load ability, because the LVS work mode logic is very simple, and work in the Network 4 layer only to do the request for distribution, no traffic, so in the efficiency of the basic need not too much consideration. In my hand, the LVS, just once the problem: in the concurrency of the highest period of time the equalizer packet loss, according to the analysis of network problems, that is, Nic or linux2.4

considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without the SED calculation.9,LBLC based on the l

delay of SED . In fact, SED is similar to WLC, except that the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equ