360 why is it removed from the App Store?

This afternoon, I heard from my friends that this post was very popular. I went to Weifeng to see it and found another brother's analysis. You can refer to it.


The news that 360 of all apps were dropped by Apple ban is the most explosive news in the past few days. However, what interests me most is that it is because Shenma Apple wants to renew 360 of the 9-family members.

Let's take a look at the official statement of 360. Its original words are:It was discovered by apple that some products had been used for ticket refresh. (The original statement is here: weibo.com/1645903643/y4m3zgdtl)

Let me translate it for you:Apple banned him from cheating.

Despite being concealed and using a "Fake ticket", this product can be regarded as cheating, but is it really so simple? A lot of experts have made various analysis and guesses on the Internet before. I think they are all reliable, but none of them have come up with evidence.

I tried something dry. I spent most of my time studying 360 things yesterday and reversed several apps of 360.Code, Amazing discoveries !!

Let's take a look. This is the reverse result from the app "360 browser HD.From the code, we can see that 360 calls Apple's undisclosed interfaces. [Note: this is what Apple hates and is banned !!!!!]

 

There are multiple references, and the listed locations all call non-public interfaces. encryption is used to escape the official review of Apple App Store. 
 

See, the following strings are encrypted:

 

Use the following code to decrypt the encrypted string:

 

 

The following content is obtained:
 

Do you understand? I would like to summarize the following:

1. 360 The method and object of this app call a large number of WebKit private methods, rather than publicly called. This is what Apple App Store cannot call.
2. Why was it not found when 360 was shelved? Because 360 uses an encrypted method to escape the review and ensure that they are successfully shelved.
3. Certainly, after Apple started its big cleansing campaign, it stepped up its review to find 360 of its violations. In the form of 360 violation and deception, it is impossible to kill 100 times. Being dismounted from the group is really a child.
4. in fact, no matter what the reason why Apple finally told 360, in short, Apple's actions have shown that 360 of its products are not popular. In front of Apple's consistent ambition to be the king, in the Chinese environment, 360 of the bandits that have been killed and grown up are quite cool. They not only need to drop their teeth and smile, but also extend their blood to other people in China to anger.
5. All the analyses I have made are available for download. You are welcome to verify them by yourself.

 I would like to remind you that you should be cautious when going to the overseas market to mix up and avoid getting rid of the bad weather in China. In the future, we should be more careful when we face Chinese companies, it can be seen that Apple's reviewers have been so biased against Chinese companies' apps since then that they will review the apps more strictly and repeatedly! 360 is really a collective sorrow of domestic developers.

In retrospect, what we can conclude with the 360 statement is:

1. 360 lied. One of the reasons for the dismounting of 360app is cheating. In addition, there is at least one reason: violation of Apple's development rules. However, 360 avoided this.
2. I bet that 360 did not dare to publish the full text of Apple's reply email. Because it must mention 360 fraud violations. Learn Han, bet 20 million.

The above is my research conclusion. You are welcome to continue.

The following is an analysis of another brother.

It has been a lively event in China over the past few days. I just returned to Silicon Valley last week and talked about 360 with my colleagues this week. I found that there are two topics concentrated, one being 360 privacy issues, the other is how to be more cautious with Apple App reviews.
There are several experts who have looked at the code of the 360 app in their spare time over the past few days. They discussed and used the code during the meeting and found the embarrassment, 360 mobile guard and battery doctor at least these two apps have a variety of violations of user privacy, but the code is very clever and I have to admire 360 in this regard.
I concentrated some of my colleagues' research results here, and some pictures were slightly processed.

1. Illegal reading of apps installed on users' iPhone

Please note that the code here is taken from app store version 360 mobile guard and 360 battery doctor. It can be seen from the code that it gets the information of the app installed on the user's iPhone through illegal access. 360 why did you read this information? What app have I installed to care about you?

I would like to ask 360: Which apps are installed on an iPhone, which is not private?

2. illegal viewing of users' photos and music folders

If you still have some privacy concerns when reading the installed app information, why did you read the photos and music folders of your iPhone? Are you suspected of taking users' photos away?

3. Illegal access to system process resource information

The following is part of the app store version 360 mobile Guard Code obtained by another colleague. The Code shows that 360 is obtaining system process resource information. This is basically the case, but it is strictly prohibited by the Apple App Store.

Here, I try to use the strictest logic to deduce it:

A and 360 read all the above information, which is not allowed by Apple. It is a developer's violation. Apple sees one kick at a time and two kicks at home. This is extremely rare among all apps.
B. What are the motivations for reading unnecessary information? I'm afraid only 360 of them know it. The company has criminal records in privacy theft and leakage. The previous year, even Google snapshots contained 360 of the uploaded privacy information and the user's account and password. That incident touched Google's employees, and this incident touched Apple's employees, which were 360 really good.
C. Leave behind motives and conspiracy theories. 360 read the unnecessary information, which is completely capable of stealing privacy.

 This is like stealing. He used to steal things. Now he is running to your house. Do you think you have reason to suspect that he is committing another crime? Therefore, I strongly doubt that 360 of them are suspected of spying on and stealing user privacy in their apps.

What I want to say is that this 360 incident must have an impact on Apple and even the entire Silicon Valley app development circle. In the future, Chinese developers must be cautious and biased, especially after reading the following code, you will think that the Chinese are basically focused on 360.

In addition, I am determined not to recommend anything to my friends and family. The company's records from PC to mobile phone are completely untrustworthy, from 360 to 3721, just like Hitler is very powerful, but can you trust him to give you any benefit?

The last update of these apps, such as the 360 mobile guard app in the App Store, was version 1.81, and 360 explicitly stated in the announcement that "the 360 product does not need to be modified, we will re-launch the Apple App Store in the next 48 hours to 72 hours. "When we wait for 360 to be available, we can analyze whether 360 has been changed, look at IPA.

Of course, if this is the result, I will have a new worry about Apple's App review mechanism.