A Comparison Between ubuntu and Fedora

A Comparison Between ubuntu and Fedora-Linux general technology-Linux technology and application information. For more information, see the following. Original: Star potato
Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
The advantage of ubuntu is its Chinese forum. Although it is not an official forum, I have to say that the environment is very good. New users can quickly obtain information from the Forum and debug their own machines.

Ubuntu has a very good culture, which I have always liked. After all, I do not have many opportunities to access English at ordinary times, so it is difficult to find the key point when I see a large English letter-not used.

Then install the software. Everything in the software library is complete, which is a good practice and convenient for each release. In addition, Because ubuntu is widely used (in linux), most software vendors support the deb package of ubuntu. Therefore, it is convenient to install the software during use.

But the defects are also very obvious.

First of all, the installation problem has never been solved by the ubuntu publisher. For ubuntu installation, I often see questions on the Internet. Then, debug the software package. Various software packages seem to cause serious problems during compilation. At least among the various linux distributions that have been used, ubuntu is the lowest compilation success rate. Finally, there are stability and some bugs, such as partition and data protection and partition mounting and unmounting.

There are many problems, but they can be basically solved in the community environment-but the real problems are also here.

You can always encounter problems (really many), but the Community can always help you solve them, but others cannot tell you how it works. This is very troublesome for most people. Therefore, I don't think ubuntu can be used for linux.

In addition, silly installation is also prone to a high degree of dependence.

Fedora8
Fedora8 is a mature release version. Each aspect is between ease of use and efficiency. In addition, bugs and other things are easy to accept.

The appearance and user-friendly design make it easy for new users to use.

Compared with ubuntu (why does it compare with ubuntu? Because there are a lot of people who use U, I used U a while ago, and now I use F), it is a bit more convenient to install (installation is dummies and there are fewer bugs. At least I have never met. I have encountered two Ubuntu installation bugs .), Debugging is rare.

But because it is a red hat product, the problem also arises.

The first is the update issue. Because red hat does not offer a good habit of updating servers locally for desktop users. Therefore, updates are laborious for Chinese users who are few linux Desktop Users. You must learn how to use axel, learn how to find the source, and so on.

Then there is a Community issue. You can see from the size of the post. The U community is well established, but F is worse. No one cares about a problem. (Exaggerated)
In addition, resources are greatly occupied. More than 300 MB of memory is needed for the previous network. Therefore, Mb is the minimum requirement for running the graphic interface. Of course, I didn't say anything if you use XFACE.

In general, ubuntu has many problems, but there are also many solutions. The point is whether you are the person who asks questions or the person who answers questions. The more people who ask questions, the more they ask. the more people who can solve the problem and who can really understand the root cause of the problem, the more they can actually improve.

Fedora depends on itself, and linux depends on itself. There is nothing to say.