A typical engineer in a typical company (from http://forum.eet-cn.com)

 

1. idealistAll of them wanted to do a great job in a certain field, and then promoted it with high morale. They received some support from a big leader who was still imaginary. Then there is a large area of rules and regulations, a variety of sporadic materials found on the Internet, a pile of standards piled up, the project and the reality become the first to break the blood, then the idealists leave, the change becomes endless, returns everything to the origin. 2. RealismBased on the traditional "relationship" approach, we strive to develop a local product that is not good or bad in a local environment and in accordance with the established "relationship" process. It can be said that there is no technology or specification, but this set works in a certain environment in reality. However, in a larger scope, it does not work. 3. More people are watching. Not willing to make changes with the idealists, but in some cases, they will despise the "low level" and "low technical level" of the realism ". But if you want him to improve his work according to certain methods and rules, it will arouse him to fight back, because it increases his work level, and there is no obvious workload. Some people may be able to provide some cool support before they know it, but they will stand by when encountering resistance. 4. PessimismI like to propose some frameworks, hope leaders can make changes, and propose some reform slogans and future goals, but there is no constructive solution or continuous motivation. The departure of the idealists brings a greater blow to their enthusiasm and emotions. What I can probably understand and abstract is the typical engineer in a typical company, where we are more or less involved. It can be said that we can hardly push forward the overall situation, but in my personal understanding, we may need some gradual and pragmatic strategies to change some reality. In reality, it is difficult for us to make things perfect all at once. In fact, this is not necessary. Often drastic changes seem very pleasing to the eye, but the cost and potential risks are hard to estimate. From a big point of view, the basic framework of the architecture in each link is filled with necessary measures to quickly improve the overall R & D quality. The rest is to work hard, refine each link, and accumulate and improve each step. For individuals, if we have different opinions, we can retain them, but we can first complete what must be done. The rest is responsible for each link and do what you can. Complaining will make you lose a lot of things.