A manager should not be a good employee

A manager should not be a good employee
In the heart of a gentleman, the belly of a gentleman will eventually discover the greatness of a gentleman; in the heart of a gentleman, the belly of a villain, the last injury is always a gentleman, a large number of people smile, a small number of people angry. A good manager should not be a gentleman. However, it is a pity that almost all managers in China have grown up from good employees. What kind of problem will this cause? Empathy is one of the most common ways for managers. In fact, empathy is indeed a good method, but managers often think this way: in this environment, how did I do it at that time? Why can't you do it? Therefore, they will put forward a lot of requirements to employees. To be honest with each other, they will not make too many requests, but they just ignore a little. At that time, he was a good employee, not everyone in your subordinates is a good employee. If they are both good employees, what else do you need for your manager? They can manage themselves, just like you at the time.
The management of managers is different from the system. The system is oriented to the general type, while the management is oriented to the particularity. If an employee in a company practices yujia, he prefers to put his feet in his mouth when working (just for example, haha), the company's leaders feel unsightly, he added a new entry to the company's rules and regulations. Employees are not allowed to put their feet in their mouths when they work. After this employee leaves, many new employees are very strange. How can this rule be implemented? Who will put their feet in their mouths? A really abnormal system. Therefore, the system cannot be specialized, and management is different. Can the management be generalized? Before answering this question, let's take a look at our big environment. In the IT industry, employee mobility is a big problem. A manager should find out the personality of its employees, it is obviously impossible to specify a set of management methods for him. Therefore, management is special and too idealistic to achieve it. Then how should our managers grasp this general scale? If a diligent manager asks his subordinates to work hard and asks them to work 7 days a week and 12 hours a day, he worked for 18 hours a day before being a manager. What problems does this cause? Hard-working people can still endure it, but lazy people can't bear it, and they will be eliminated slowly. There is an old saying in China that a strong army is no weak soldier. This is probably the truth. But this is just what the ancients said. Does it still make sense? Maybe the answer is no. There seems to be a saying in management. If your subordinates always share the same opinion with you, then you or your subordinates must have someone redundant. Talent is diverse. A diligent person counts as a talent, but a lazy person counts as a talent if his work efficiency is very high and he is creative, however, under a diligent manager, such a person is hard to survive. Therefore, a manager I am talking about here should not be a good employee. It refers to a manager. Only by tolerating all the shortcomings of his subordinates can he stay away from their shortcomings, discover their strengths. In addition, a manager is the soul of a team and the bond between subordinates and subordinates. Only by recognizing the greatness of subordinates can a good role be played, it's all scum. Let alone it's connecting. Maybe it's him who is the first to have a conflict.