A preliminary understanding of philosophy 6

Aristotle put forward the moral nature of reason and virtue

Rational virtue, a person's rational thinking more powerful, the more rational, equivalent to the current test-oriented education.

Moral virtue, the performance of daily life, the equivalent of the current quality education.

Now it seems that people often say to pay attention to quality education, but if there is no test-oriented education, then a person does not have rational thinking, how can we make good moral performance? Or more extreme, how do you know that such moral performance is good?

God is supposed to be a motionless follower in Aristotle's eyes, why? In fact, after God created all things, and went to all things, if God for a person to bless him or curse him, then his mind has been determined by the individual, is no longer the perfect person, and God must be the perfect person.

Aristotle's view of happiness, for Plato, is that the flesh is dismissive of him.

But here in Aristotle, thought has changed, and Aristotle believes that people should be active, free from evil, good in moderation, rational in thought, and self-fulfilling.

To think is a rational thing. Many things have been learned before meditation, and meditation is to find out all the things that are common behind them.

When you are learning, you find that you know a lot of things you do not know, you feel very happy, but because it is not perfect you to learn. So it's just fun.

And what is happiness? It is when you learn a lot of things, to meditate, to think about the logic behind it, the common ground behind, and then summed up the things, when you know these, you will feel happy.

Through continuous learning, I also gradually have their own views of philosophy, in fact, many times the philosophy is not necessarily to learn and learn, philosophy may bring you not to know how much history of the great philosopher, nor understand how many philosophers psychological ideas, I do not mean that they are not important, but more importantly, When we are learning our thinking, our logic, I found, in thinking, this logic is not like mathematics and its strict, attention is strictly not strict, that logic is only you to think about, use their own ideas out of, many times I think, according to their own logic to push, Not to prove that you are right, but to prove that you are thinking. Such moments of thinking are not given to other disciplines.

There are many times, or so, should be to listen to other people's advice, rather than immediately to prove that they are right, think is rational things, it should be in meditation after the results, we actually want to think about the final process, and not just for one's own grievance or other people's words and interfere with their own, We are behind with good and moderate.

Indeed, examination-oriented education has a bad place, will cultivate a lot of inertial thinking, which leads to learning is not a method but skills, then the method of learning skills? How to learn the techniques? This may never be true, but you know what you should do if you don't take the test?

A preliminary understanding of philosophy 6