Seeing a fairly good BUG management tool URTracker essay, we have also developed a bug tracking tool recently to talk about our own feelings.
Since the company's original bug has been managed using Word documents, it is inconvenient for a bug ticket to go back and forth between testers and developers.
Therefore, a bug management system is built with BugTracker.net in idle time.
BugTracker.net is also web-based and open-source. It is written using asp.net in a mix of Page code and script code, rather than common
. Aspx file-. cs file method. Provides common bug management functions and mail subscription functions. And the running speed is good, although there are still some problems (mainly in search by date, and report by user), fortunately it is open-source and can be easily modified by itself, in addition, a small team can provide enough functions. You can also customize the query, report, and print functions to print a bug details and bug list. The report provides a pie chart, bar chart, line chart, and list, now I have defined several reports to display the number of bugs in each module, the number of bugs fixed by one person, and the number of bugs found by each person, the workload of testers and developers can be counted (of course, the workload cannot be fully reflected). At the same time, the test case module is added for extension, and the original part of the system is simplified.
This is the first time I used open-source software for implementation and maintenance. I cannot help but feel the advantages of open-source software. I can modify and expand it as needed.
The following describes some similar software that was considered before using BugTracker.net:
OnTimer:
There are cs and web versions, which are charged. However, it seems that something written in. net is easy to crack. I used Reflector to look at it and it is easy to find the encrypted place. This software is more complex than bugTracker.net, with more detailed permission control and does not seem to be limited to bug tracking, but tends to manage defects. It also uses components such as aspnetmenu, Which is slower than bugTracker.net.
BugZilla:
I have heard that it is a very powerful tool, but next I will try to use MySql, and the code seems to be written in Perl (what is the use of. pm and. pl files ?), Fear, no need.
MyTracker:
InterBse database is used in two ways: cs and web. I installed InterBase in the afternoon. I am going to check it out tomorrow. This software is not limited to bug tracking, but also has other functions, the help is comprehensive and will be available later.
Mantis:
Based on PHP and MySql, It is not maintained and does not need to be used.
The software listed above is all in my essay:
Other friends in the Bug tracking software mentioned this.
In general, although BugTracker.net has many defects, it is simple and practical for a small team and is also easy to maintain and expand.
