Analysis of the large-scale professional technology Exchange Group is how to play bad?

First of all, first introduce yourself, read the article to know what the author is doing

Ido Lao Xu, internet practitioners, software testing veteran, 08 began to engage in software testing profession, before and after 3 companies, from the Test side to the company test leader, lead the Test team responsible for the company's entire product system;

Focus on testing career exploration, test management, project management, testing experience, share their own test ideas, test experience, hope to make your career path less detours!

In this paper, the author takes the occupation: Software Test as the breakthrough point to analyze the statement; Other professional and technical exchange groups are also the same;

Software Testing as a god-like profession in it, the real rise has been in recent years!

Today Lao Xu shares: why each big test group flooded with a variety of zombies. Never speak, nor rename, nor retreat Group

What kind of psychology is it?

First look at a set of data:

Two images below

Most active 2000 people test large groups

Most active 2000 people test large groups

The above two groups of pictures are currently the most active in the testing industry ranked top ten software testing group of 2000 people

The most active, but also only 800 people active, active rate less than 40% (active rate How do you think everyone should know? The old Xu does not expand here)

Some groups, even only the 20-30% active rate!

The question is, what are the members of these groups doing? Why does it never bubble up after you enter a group?

Of course, this phenomenon everyone may know, think, more or less know some reasons, but not in-depth to think, to share, to discuss;

Today, Lao Xu briefly stated some personal views, welcome to add, discuss:

First of all, why test the Professional Exchange group so hot, so much! (There should be at least 1000 software testing related groups; The specific data is not counted, only guess; a friend who has done this statistic is welcome to Lao Xu)

1. It field students should know that in testing this piece, the overall is still relatively weak, a lot of beginners even work for a few years, but also just a functional tester, only a simple point mouse, so they urgently need to enter the group to communicate with you;

2. Many beginners, or college graduates, think the test is very simple, want to engage in the test profession, the first thought is to enter the test communication group;

3. Of course, there is a lot of transfer from other professions to test, the most is the development of transfer testing, since entering the testing industry, many thinking, tools, methods, processes and testing will not be the same, urgent need to communicate, the most convenient way, of course, is to enter the industry Exchange Group;

4. Many students want to go deep, to learn some automated testing, performance testing, the first thought is also into the relevant professional testing group, and Daniel Exchange;

5. Testing as a non-typical technical group, is the urgent need for a network platform with peers blowing water chat, so, non-group Mo genus;

So why are the groups only so active?

1. Many Daniel originally intended to be in the group to share, found that the group all day is a variety of water blowing chat, and then directly block the group (why not directly back group it?) This is related to the psychology of people, shielding the message is easier to reach than the group;

2. Many beginners, or novice, into the group was originally intended to ask questions, but also afraid of their own questions too simple, despised, over time, lying in the group silently watching everyone chatting, do a quiet zombie;

3. There are too many groups, not too much energy to group chat, so basically only in certain groups active (large groups, repeat the number of members; Basically no one has dozens of test groups)

4. Ask a few questions, no one answer, no one bird, the passage of time will not speak, and did not achieve the original intention to answer questions;

5. Many students, is to add a group and add a group, so many active communication group, want to join in order to prevent miss any wonderful technical knowledge, or blowing water topic;

6. The concentration camp-style management of some groups leads to the inability of members to communicate: such as too simple questions are not allowed to ask, not to publish the sentiment, font color size requirements, constraints too much without the pleasure of exchange discussion; ( this article adopted from Lao Xu Reader: Code8192.forerunner's view )

As above, over time, the group has become a small circle of daily gossip blowing water group!

--end--

Above, several cases, have not been able to resonate?

If you want Lao Xu not to know, you are welcome to add

Off Topic:

Is there a real technology exchange group, can answer questions, technical atmosphere is strong?

How should these situations be solved?

Of course, there is a solution to improve the next time to share with you, exchange;

If you want to communicate your views with Lao Xu in real time, share your experience, like Lao Xu Consulting you exist various problems

Dabigatran " Software test : invite you to walk" (339611752) real-time communication with Lao Xu

Share, grow, Harvest!

Analysis of the large-scale professional technology Exchange Group is how to play bad?