Analysis on the problems and solutions of using dependency injection in Node.js _node.js

Recently, I have shifted to using dependency injection to help understand the simple ways of separating code and helping to test. However, the modules in Node.js rely on the system APIs provided by Node, which makes it difficult to tell if private dependencies are properly used. General dependency injection is difficult to use in this case, but don't give up hope now.

Requirecauses problem

Node.js can easily import dependencies according to requirements. It works well and is simpler than the AMD mode loader such as Requirejs. The problem comes when we simulate those dependencies. If the load of the model in the Node.js is controlled, what can we do to control the pseudo object being used during the test? We can use node's VM model and we can load the model in a new context with the VM. Running in the new context, we can control how the demand reflects the model.

Solution

Thanks for this article, you can now offer a pretty good solution. The code is below:

 var VM = require (' VM '); var fs = require (' FS '); var path = require (' path ');
/** * Helper for unit Testing: *–load module with mocked dependencies *–allow accessing private state of the module *
* @param {string} filePath absolute path to module (file to load) * @param {object=} mocks Hash of mocked dependencies * * Exports.loadmodule = function (FilePath, mocks) {mocks = mocks | |
 
{}; This is necessary to allow relative path modules within loaded file//i.e. requiring./some inside File/a/b.js needs
  To is resolved to/a/some var resolvemodule = function (module) {if (Module.charat (0)!== '. ') return module;
Return Path.resolve (Path.dirname (FilePath), module);
 
};
var exports = {};
  var context = {Require:function (name) {return Mocks[name] | | | require (RESOLVEMODULE (name));
 
}, Console:console, Exports:exports, module: {exports:exports}};
Vm.runinnewcontext (Fs.readfilesync (FilePath), context);
return context;
}; 

You can also download code snippets here. Although it is not the most published code in the article, he can still use some explanations. When we test, we have to load this module into the test and use theloadmodulefunction instead of Ofrequire to load the module test.

The first parameter filepath specifies the lookup location where we want to test the model. The second parameter mocks contains an object, and the object's property name matches the name of the model we are trying to require. The values specified by those attributes are pseudo objects and are used in place of a model that is generally require.

Essentially, the VM is used to load and run the model in another "context". In other words, we have rebuilt global variables (such as require and exports) so that we can control them. Note that we have written a new require function that is available. All you do is check to see if there is a mock dependency on the name of the execution, and if you have it every day, I'll delegate it to that common require function.

Example of using the module loader

If you're still a bit confused, you can look at the code example below to see how it's used in context, perhaps to help you understand something. First, we create a simple module.

var fs = require (' FS ');
 
Module.exports = {
//do something with ' FS '
}
Imagine this is cool, right? Anyway, now we're testing that module, but we're going to simulate FS to see how it's used internally.
 
///Jasmine ' s syntax http://pivotal.github.com/jasmine/
describe (' Somemodule ', function () {
var LoadModule = require (' Module-loader '). LoadModule;
var module, Fsmock;
 
Beforeeach (function () {
Fsmock = {
 //a mock for ' FS '
};
 
Load the module with mock FS instead of real fs
module = LoadModule ('./web-server.js ', {fs:fsmock});
};
 
it (' should work ', function () {
//a test that utilizes the fact so we can now control ' FS '
});

The main note is that from 7 to 12 lines, we create a pseudo object for FS and use our new LoadModule function to connect this object to the small module above (I mean awesome!). Keep in mind that this is awesome, right? ）。