Apple's review is rejected from IOS apps.

I recently submitted an application called Mao ).

I like some cool quotes. I have already made an application of the spicy quotes, but it is monotonous to have no pictures. The modemy is to use the unique eyes of the cat to express the anchor quotations of the current generation. I want to match my text application. However, there are very few images found on the Internet. After all, copyright problems are involved and all images cannot be used. Therefore, my idea is very simple. I am a friend who can help modemy and modemy to show the pictures and quotations of these images, the purchase URL of genuine books is provided. The application is simple, and it is also an attempt. For the sake of simplicity, I put all the nearly one hundred photos I have collected into the app, which looks like 5 MB. It looks like this.

Two seemingly ridiculous reasons why such an application has been submitted and rejected during review

2.23We found that your app does not follow the iOS Data Storage Guidelines, which is required per the App Store Review Guidelines.In particular, we found that on launch and/or content download, your app stores 4.9 Mb data. To check how much data your app is storing:

3.12We also found that your app includes URLs (http://www.hehexiao.com/) which do not properly navigate to the intended destination, which is not in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines.

In reason 2.23, the reason for rejection is particularly stated that the data is downloaded at 4.9m during loading. This 4.9m data is copied from the application directory to the documents directory during the first loading. This violates Apple's data storage rules. Later I learned that I could not put images in the documents directory. I used three20 to display images. images were not placed in the documents directory and could only be placed online for loading.

The reason 3.12 is even more interesting and has never been met before. Support URL does not contain information about the modemy application, yes, http://www.hehexiao.com is just one of my joke websites. I did not expect that Apple has now strengthened its strict review, requiring that the support URL must contain application-related information. The solution only supports one page and will introduce this application separately.

The above two reasons are for the andriod application, which is not a problem at all, but for Apple, It is the reason for rejection. Such reasons ensure the quality of the app in the App Store, and enable developers to do everything well, instead of making up for it. For this review, I agree with my hands. Only in this way can the App Store ecosystem be used for a long time and won't be downgraded by the third-party application.

Latest feedback: After modification, it has passed the review and is now available on the app store. The link will not be published, saving that it is advertising.

Post Note: http://blog.csdn.net/ugg