Based on the reader analysis of what soft content more in line with the reader's "appetite"

If you often read A5 webmaster articles, will find that every day there will be old webmaster here to share how to write soft article, no matter how the idea or how to get material and so on all aspects of the said are very detailed, but these simple reasoning really useful? Just a friend of mine. For example, he came back here every day to learn, Then go back to write articles, but many of these articles are mercilessly returned, this is why? In fact, many articles are not to say that there is wrong information, in misleading beginners, but many articles we do not grasp the reader's psychology, do not know what kind of soft wen is the most "stomach", Most of the time you write down the feeling of reading someone else's article is the best way of writing.

"What is written, more than 1000 words, but can not understand the subject of the article?"

Believe that this is a lot of readers in the pre-read article is the most often complained about the feelings, many people have written a good thousands of words, but let the reader unintelligible, do not know the theme of the article, so this article can be on the stomach? Edit the article may have to review hundreds of articles a day, how to let your article as fast as possible to let the reader understand, The quality of your article has been seriously affected. So we write soft wen when we must pay attention to our soft Wen said understand, the content of the theme of the idea as soon as possible, avoid half-hearted, test the reader's patience.

Soft article quick Highlight Theme tips:

1 The content of the reasonable segmentation, using a good bold or Arabic numerals

2 try to make an overview of the article in the first paragraph.

3 Good article title, the content of the main essence of the show in the title

"Although the article is very professional, but the content is boring, see half can not go down!"

We have to say that there are many webmaster in the A5, from their hands of the article generally have a good readability, but some articles tend to appear a very embarrassing problem, that is to A5 study may be a lot of beginners, they do not have much understanding of the industry, And this time, if our article starts with a whole bunch of professional jargon, I think they may be confused in the beginning, so to the author's point of view, we can as far as possible the article "vernacular", with the help of the most understandable language explanation, make our content more interesting, easy to learn, seize the user's eyeball. This is especially true of the webmaster friends who are skilled but have never been able to write articles.

The article removes the tedious technique:

1 The content of the article can best be linked with the current hot events, such as you write site user experience, you can combine the recent Baidu in order to enhance the user experience and added "Add to Baidu Homepage" button, this can attract readers.

2 appropriate combination of Internet terminology, closer to the distance between the netizens.

3 The tone of our article to be appropriate, should not be expressed in an educational tone, and the reader's communication than reasoning more important.

　"After reading the article, although I think it is reasonable, but I still do not know how to start?"

This is the problem of many articles, especially some technical articles, although read through the full text feel very reasonable, but for beginners, the article's easy to learn and value is proportional to, a successful article if only fun is obviously not, the article write out the most important or help readers to reflect the value, So the article must have certain operability. To the author in A5 observation, some people in order to let the article through the audit, will write their own some take for granted did not verify the content, such as this article: short URL is not suitable for use in SEO, the article in the expression of miniature after the address is not suitable for SEO, in the 3rd point of view that these short URLs can not form a direct clickable link , this view is a complete error, misleading the reader's point of view, I can certainly say that the miniature of the address can be opened, at least in the search to ask is OK. And this is not verified by the idea of breaking the argument is a kind of irresponsible to the reader.

Tips to improve the operability of the article:

1 to join the real case analysis, rather than just short talk misleading readers.

2 Add a clear picture, beware of misleading novice into the wrong.

This article does not want to pass some rules and regulations on how to write articles, I just want to talk to a most common readers as readers in reading articles is easy to encounter problems, I hope this article can help you write more with the reader on the stomach article. Articles from what to eat kidney Yang Yang http://www.th1997.com webmaster original, reproduced please retain the source.