Basic requirements for testing personnel capabilities

It is of great benefit to see the exchange of related capabilities in the test group today.
Some people think that, for testers, improving their abilities means writingCodeJingguang's profound understanding of capabilities has been approved by everyone.
The following Original article references:
Write code. More computing technologies are not necessarily capabilities.
Do not always think about writing code. If you need computing power, it is also a basic capability. There are actually a lot of other capabilities. You have a good understanding of computer software and hardware, composition principles, circuit logic, and so on. You can summarize these knowledge and apply it in your normal work, this is the capability. For example, if a leader asks you to complete a task, how can you understand the true intention of the leader, various information related to the task, find out the key, and then complete the task.
In other words, the ability is multi-faceted. Writing code does not mean that the ability is high. Writing code does not mean that the ability is low. It can only be said that, for yourself, when you write code, the ability is higher than when you do not write code.

I have seen many quality testers on the InternetArticleHere, I would like to talk about my personal views on the abilities of testers.
As Jing Guang said, our ability is multi-faceted. Our evaluation of a person's ability should also be a comprehensive evaluation.
Skills include basic skills, work skills, and professional skills.
Basic skills include communication and expression skills (inductive and summative skills), document writing skills, and learning skills. Work skills include work initiative, responsibility, and quality awareness, the working ability is based on the basic ability and the ability to use the basic ability to solve various tasks at work. We often talk about coding, automated/performance testing tools, it is a professional skill. Therefore, professional skills do not represent an individual's comprehensive ability. Only by mastering and applying both professional skills and basic skills to our work can we better improve our work ability and reflect a good overall ability. The relationship between these three capabilities is like the working principle of a bucket. If the capacity of this bucket is low, the capacity will be greatly reduced. The trend of learning automated testing tools and performance testing tools is prevalent today. While improving professional capabilities, do not ignore other capabilities.

I think this is very important to talk about the ability to generalize and summarize in communication and expression. Many people did not talk about things when describing things. The listeners were confused and did not know what they were talking about. This is also the case when many people ask questions on the forum. This is the problem of lack of inductive summarization capabilities. It is also a capability to describe your problem in extracted and summative words.

In addition, quality awareness in work ability is often ignored, but I absolutely this is very important to testers. Imagine that, as a quality-related tester, if the quality requirements for the output are not high and many documents are written incorrectly, the description of the submitted defects lacks the necessary steps, I have been dealing with tasks without high quality requirements. How can I ask developers to produce high-quality code?