Beautiful goat's head-university undergraduate Evaluation

(Reprinted) beautiful goat's head-university undergraduate Evaluation

Author: rare Moon stars

Source: Xinyu

The Chinese media often have such strange things that the original committee of a certain thing is unknown, but they are constantly responding to the incident.

It may be that I am ignorant and report publicly opposed to or criticized the evaluation of undergraduate courses in colleges and universities in the media, but there are not many reports,

The response from the Ministry of Education is one after another. You can compile a series of reports. The Ministry of Education

It is the Ministry of Education, where the principle of the question is always well-founded and far-sighted. There is no need to talk about the theory of policy.

It is a "general example abroad" and some vivid cases, which can be understood and supported by the "masses.

However, I may be stubborn. I always feel that some local Ministry of Education seems to be talking about the actual situation below.

For example, Director Liu Fengtai of the Higher Education Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Education said: "the vast majority

Schools are seeking truth from facts in organizing materials. It can be said that there are very few frauds ". Don't know

What is the basis of his speech? I have been involved in several universities who are busy working overtime for the evaluation.

Well, what are you busy with? We are all aware that the two holidays stipulated by the pre-assessment education law will not be released,

The Ministry of Education said, "sort out materials and report to the Expert Group

Performance should also be shown. "Does it take so long to organize materials truthfully,

It takes a few days to write the year-end summary. Of course it is normal, but it takes a few months to write the year-end summary.

It is not only a joke, but also a big problem.

The evaluation policy of "promoting construction by evaluation, promoting reform by evaluation, promoting management by evaluation, combining evaluation and construction, focusing on Construction" is true

It is so loud that people feel reasonable in theory and that policies are highly operable.

Long term. However, if you think about it, there are still some problems with this beautiful policy. It seems that it is not

Everything can be like this, just like building a building. If we build a building with great efforts

Building a building without night instead of following a certain scientific and reasonable schedule is dangerous and

Don't talk about education. Education is a long-term plan. If so

This general evaluation and evaluation can make great progress in a short period of time, so I am afraid it is not a teaching

Education.

"Evaluation is a common example of all countries in the world". I don't know which countries are the examples, and

It seems that some countries do not even have the Ministry of Education, nor do they have vertical education administration management like China.

And weak private education), how is it evaluated. There are two words: one is in line with international standards,

One Chinese character (national condition) is in line with the standards when it is in line with the standards. If it is not in line with the standards, we will talk about China.

Features. We will not talk about how it is evaluated abroad, whether it is successful or not, but whether many things are good outside China.

It changes.

It is undeniable that the evaluation puts pressure on school leaders to give teachers to students and, to some extent, strengthens

Teaching Work (in fact, most of them are also formal things, such as the homework that may be checked for preparing lessons, taking notes, and teaching plans, etc,

So that some courses were originally prepared on the computer, and all the materials should be printed and bound into a book .)

After three days, the students attended lectures and Their experiments were also strengthened.

Experiments are one of the key points of the Inspection. These may be the "important construction" that the Ministry of Education hopes. Everything has

There are advantages and disadvantages. The key lies in the trade-offs. Especially for such a large-scale impact assessment, policies are both effective and positive.

If so, what are the negative effects? Should a third party evaluate the evaluation?

Estimate.

The results of the evaluation are mountain materials, well-equipped laboratories, clean school buildings, spotless

Campus (cleaned over n times) and exhausted teachers and students.

The negative impact of the evaluation is to fundamentally corrupt the style of study, and the students take it seriously.

(Students are the future of the country); disrupt the normal teaching and scientific research order.

In the middle, a lot of resources are wasted. The consumption of printing paper alone may create several millionaires.

(Think about the hope of primary school. On the one hand, there is a shortage of educational funds, and on the other hand, there is a huge amount of money to spend );

The most important thing is whether the evaluation can promote the construction and improve the quality of teaching through evaluation (not the improvement of the attack ).

A large question mark. It is true that the evaluation has strengthened the standardized management of some colleges to a certain extent, but it cannot

It is inferred that the improvement of teaching quality, the quality of teachers, the quality of students, the style of study in schools, and these fears

Even though it is not just an encouraging evaluation, let alone the true spirit of the University and lack of faith

Loss, numbness of thoughts, and lack of thirst for knowledge. The improvement of these internal things is more important than strict standardized management.

It must be 1000 times. The size of the university is not the size of the building. Now there are fewer and fewer masters. Should we look for the reasons from the rigid education management system?

People are impetuous, and policies will also be impetuous. things such as the Great Leap Forward putting the satellite hard work are still fresh in our memories. Bi

The practice of one service is used in education. It is definitely not in line with the internal law of pedagogy. Education is a step-by-step process.

The process should not be quick success. Which school is strong and which school is weak? In fact, there are a number of peers.

I am afraid it is a bit naive to make a weak one stronger after an evaluation. In a market economy

The evaluation is really a lot of evaluation, that is, the market, learning to use, learning to use, the evaluation of the Ministry of Education is excellent,

It is useless for students to find a job.