Boundary and Boundary

Boundaries and desires

For example, if we take the human freedom population as a plane, each person is the above point and the circle around each point is its free range. If a person's freedom range is too large, it will intrude into or squeeze other people's freedom range. Rational freedom has boundaries. The unlimited freedom of a person means that others are not free. It is unrealistic to emphasize the desire to be free without considering the boundaries of freedom. Therefore, both the legal system and democracy are equally important, how to achieve a balance that everyone is satisfied with is politics.

It is impossible for everyone to win when four people play mahjong.

This article will not talk about politics, but talk about conflicts between desires.

In other words, starting with prehistoric civilization ......

Natural law

The extinction of large mammals is usually due to the end of the ice age and the warming of the weather. Biological Evolution will adapt to long changes. In fact, on the North American ice source, there are still a group of large mammals. Why does it disappear in the short term?

Do not ignore the traps invented by humans. A trap is a whole group (for example, catch up with a cliff, and there is no surplus) of hunting. The number of kills is far greater than the needs of the population. Large waste of prey cannot be preserved (no refrigerator, it is impossible to dry all, dry to prevent beasts and settle down to a certain extent and other part of the agricultural social characteristics, it is not clear the air drying time ).

The conclusion is that people suffer from hunger and then suffer a decrease in population.

Agriculture increases population

Agricultural inventions, agricultural and animal husbandry replace hunting, coexist, comparison, the health of farming is worse than hunting, which has been proved by an archaeological physique. Farming, daily work, daily work, face to the loess back to the sky, precise planning every year, hard work, very hard, but also malnutrition, lack of protein. Compared with the limited hunting time of hunting tribes every day, the rest of the singing and dancing are idle, and food is hard to save. It takes a few days. After a few days? A few days later, I thought that the forest that feeds their ancestors would feed them.

Hunting has a strong body and a relatively leisurely life, but is eliminated. Although the agricultural population is poor in quality, it is difficult to win in quantity. If you win in quantity, you will always win in ten cases.

Therefore, there is no inevitable synchronization between population growth and population quality growth.

Food and population

When technological innovations, such as the introduction of plow and the emergence of new crops, such as the introduction of American crops, total social food will increase. As per-capita food increases and gets rich, the population increases, and then the per-capita food declines until the next technological leap or reach the minimum per-capita food limit, and the population stops growing.

Before every population surge, the first rich (this article only discusses food), with the rapid increase of population, is the post-poor. If it is not controlled, the population will always develop towards the maximum saturation limit, along with a decline in the per capita value. The emergence of new technologies and new crops will produce a larger total saturation, which is equivalent to reducing the population saturation at that time.

The average value is inversely proportional to the population saturation, but the total saturation can change.

Modern agriculture

Modern agriculture relies on inorganic fertilizers, pesticides, and mechanization.

When people are happy with green food, green food is divided into pollution-free food and organic food. The toxic food we often encounter is the misuse of pesticides and land pollution, corresponding to pollution-free food. It is impossible not to use pesticides at all. planting small flowers and grass at home will give you an experience. The field calculated on an acre cannot be manually solved. The key is the rational use of pesticides, which can achieve pollution-free. The principle of expelling good coins based on bad coins cannot rely on the market, but on supervision.

Yuan Longping's hybrid rice won't work if it doesn't have fertilizer. If it needs fertilizer to support enough soil, ask the farmer or the farmer who planted it. The so-called organic food is just a plaything for the masses. If we turn all the fields into organic fields, it is certainly a famine.

Mechanization is also a way to save labor, not to increase output, but to save costs.

Controlled population and transgenic

The speed of population growth is crazy. Although China has implemented family planning, it has grown from 1980s people in 1 billion to 1.4 billion people. In 30 years, the population has increased by 40%. Look at India, just around the corner of the Chinese population.

At this growth rate, coupled with market development and the decrease of arable land, the three axes of modern agriculture are far lower than the growth rate, and the rise of crop prices is inevitable. There has been a technological leap to resolve this conflict. Currently, only transgenic technologies are available.

I am opposed to genetic modification. I have not found any problems at present. It may be that the time is too short. These problems may only come after several generations of observations. However, if the food is insufficient, there is no choice.

There are now a group of people opposed to family planning (Note: This is the process of family planning itself rather than the process of family planning. Some people are opposed to brutal execution, that is, they are opposed to the wrong method to request a correct method, but it is not equal to the opposition to the family planning policy itself, but here it refers to the opposition to the family planning policy itself), the opposition to genetic modification, and the demand for organic food, especially for a group of people on the Internet, known as Kochi. This cannot be implemented simultaneously.

If people want demographic benefits all day, do they still want to make money by polluting our environment and exploiting our labor-type sweatshops? When the economy develops to a certain stage, the model needs to be changed and the industry needs to be transformed. It is said that the Social Security Fund is not enough. First, we should deal with people who do not need to pay social security but get more civil servants and public institutions than anyone else. We should ask everyone to pay social security with the same pension. Even if the current problem is released, those who become labor force will not solve the current problem 20 years later. Don't talk about these issues, otherwise, our generation's efforts will be wasted.

If we let it go, we should avoid any organic food (waste of land and reduce production), instead, we should embrace genetic modification. Since we have not found any problems, we should promote them in large quantities (increase production ). If you want to occupy everything, and all the circles must be big, these circles will squeeze and deform each other, And the bubbles will burst.

Population restraint is another way to reduce or maintain saturation. I agree with this approach. At a certain stage, we can have two couples and balance the population of each generation. As for what kind of magic horse power is, whether quality or quantity is important or not is important is a problem.

Everyone has his freedom, while freedom has boundaries. Everyone has his desires, and his desires have boundaries. If you want both quality and quantity, please provide possible solutions. Otherwise, they will be flushed to the cloud, just to increase your eye.