BS article: Ghana's evaluation article "The hand of God beyond sports morality Ghana does not need to cry"

He Wei was read this morning: the hand of god surpasses sports morality. Ghana does not need to cry.

Is the definition too arbitrary and narrow?

If the hand of god surpasses sports morality, can he think that the behavior of suares is a disregard of sports morality? I think that should be done by any enterprising athlete who is on the scene.

I think that, as I mentioned above, in the 94-year period, Italy's Italian goalkeeper palucia rushed out of the restricted area to attack and destroy his opponent. I think there is no difference in the behavior of suáres, but with more respect, I think suares should also be respected!

 

In the last match, merlot's pedaling behavior in Brazil should also be called "No sports morality. The hands and balls of Suarez are basically different from those of Maradona's god. It should be said that Maradona's God's hand is immoral.

After all, this is a sports activity within the rules of a sports competition. For this reason, suares received the appropriate punishment and added a red card to the ball. Isn't it the charm of a sport competition that the final result of the final reversal of Ghana's penalty? I think this is even more amazing! Therefore, the behavior of suáres has nothing to do with sports morality. This is the qualities that excellent players should possess!

 

Ghana does not need to cry? Forgetting in Argentina is more suitable, because everyone is familiar with Argentina. Don't cry for me! Isn't it because of more sympathy for a ball? Of course, it is a pity to be eliminated, but the author may not cry. The lyrical articles of the onlookers are too persistent and biased.

 

Finally, I would like to praise suáres's decision-making and the choice between the sinner and the hero (this is too difficult, especially in an instant ).

We should say sorry for Ghana. Unlike the Netherlands, Ghana is working harder!