C ++ program design principles and practices after a trial, I wrote a book review.

Previous words: I'm glad to have applied for a trial. Thank you for choosing chapter Hua & w3china. However, in college (very far away, sigh)
C ++ programming, C ++ primer, and inside C ++ object
Model has studied C ++, and there is not much chance to do some industrial applications of C ++ after the University (mainly using Java ). Therefore, the impression of C ++ is basically at the Language Mechanism level.
The authors in this book criticize those groups who do not have much practical experience. I hope that book reviews (this is also the assignment of netizens who have applied for trial reading opportunities) will be a reference for considering the TX of this book.

=============== Split line at the beginning of the book review ========================

 

In summary, this is a book that uses C ++ as a carrier to show how to learn programming. At the beginning of the book (Chapter 1), the author expressed his disagreement with some common learning programming design ideas at the methodology layer.
My own point of view on how to learn Program Design: Learn Program Design in the practice of program design. Later, the author demonstrated this learning process by studying C ++ program design. In the preface, the author said:
It is a book written to beginners. Indeed, in chapter 1st, he talked about some computer things for new users, and then (Chapter 2-5) this article introduces some basic concepts for process-oriented programming (expressions, statements, programs, and common
See errors and so on). In chapter 6-7, we demonstrated the process of implementing a calculator to consolidate the previous knowledge points and demonstrate some of the traditional ideas proved by practice in programming. Next
In chapter 8-9, the author adds the previous details about functions and classes that are easy for readers to learn and ignore. At this point, the author has finished the basic knowledge he wants to introduce. In Part 2-3, the author provides information about C ++
For more details, the fourth part provides some extended reading content (other programming books rarely involve this content, according to my lack of reading in this aspect ). For more information, see
The directory has a general understanding.

 

I think it is not an exaggeration to use the "authoritative guide for C ++ Beginners" label. To learn a new thing, the most important thing is to be able to master the basic concepts of orthodox correctness at the entry stage, and not to bend around during the learning process.
Path. (Think about the diligent and well-performing folk scientists, I think their main disadvantage is that they have not been trained by formal disciplines and learned what is wrong at the entry stage.
Heartache .) For this reason, I recommend a beginner's programming friend to buy one, because the biggest selling point of this book (in my opinion) lies in its orthodox content; it also clearly emphasizes an effective learning approach:
After mastering the basic elements of language, you can learn program design in a large number of practices. In addition, even if you are not a C ++ programmer in the future, the basic knowledge of the first part of this book is universal and will be helpful for learning the vast majority of languages. This
In addition, I like it very much: while introducing some language mechanisms of C ++, demonstrate your considerations when designing these language mechanisms (to better express your ideas or avoid mistakes that are easy to make in programming)
). This expression that draws the reader to the back of C ++ is more convincing and triggers the reader's thinking. I recommend this book to students who are new to programming and do not understand C ++ well.
C ++ programmers.

 

For those who have already passed the entry stage and have rich experience, I think this book is not so important: it may be because the author understands C ++ too well, this book is written with a bit of cloudification
It is not very suitable for reference manuals. Of course, fans of the author may have a copy. In general, this book can be translated well, and it is not picky if it is a little literal. After all, it is difficult to proofread such a thick book.
It is easy to get tired and neglected. Fortunately, there are not many such problems that do not affect reading.