Like this common "ordinary" calculator, in fact everything can be counted (with the limit, what can become subtraction). Among them, the natural logarithm is especially good, this article will provide a method, mainly using the calculator's Open square function.
As we all know, the natural logarithm has the following expansion type:
\ (Ln{x} = x-\frac{x^{2}}{2}+\frac{x^{3}}{3}-\frac{x^{4}}{4}+\cdots \)
But this thing is too hard for this "normal" calculator. So, all roads lead to Rome, here we change a way of thinking.
Recall how the derivative of the function \ (y = a^x (a> 0, a \neq 1) \) was introduced:
\ (\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}a^x \)
\ (=\lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{a^{x+ \delta x}-A^x}{\delta x} \)
\ (=\lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}a^x\frac{a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta x} \)
\ (=a^x\lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta X} \) (1)
It can be seen that the back of the limit has been with \ (x\) does not matter, should be equal to a a\ with the constant. So how much is this constant? Easy to find, make \ (x=0 \) Available
\ (\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}a^x \big|_{x=0} =\lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{a^{\delta x}-1}{\Delta x} \)
In other words, this limit is equal to the function at \ (x=0\) the guide value. According to the exponential function of the image, we "guess" (here is not very rigorous, but this is not the focus of this article) when \ (a\) Take a value, the limit is equal to \ (1\), the function's Guide function is constant equal to the function itself. Set this value to \ (e\) (can be calculated as \ (e = 2.71828\cdots\), with \ (ln{x}\) to the base \ (e\) (x\) of the logarithm), you can get
\ (\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} e^x = e^x \)
So
\ (\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} a^x \)
\ (= \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} (E^{ln{a}) ^x\) (generation of logarithmic identities available)
\ (= \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} e^{xln{a}} \)
\ (= \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} (Xln{a})} E^{xln{a}} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} (Xln{a}) (Chain rule)
\ (= E^{xln{a}}\cdot ln{a} \)
\ (= {(E^{ln{a}})}^x\cdot ln{a} \)
\ (= A^x\cdot ln{a} \)
Compared with (1), it is
\ (Ln{a} = \lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta x} \)
On the left is the logarithm, the right is the exponent, close to the target one step, but still not calculate. Turn the exponential into a radical with some black technology:
\ (Ln{a} = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{a^{x}-1}{x} \)
\ (= \lim_{k\rightarrow +\infty}\frac{a^{(2^{-k})}-1}{(2^{-k})} \)
\ (= \lim_{k\rightarrow +\infty} (A^{\frac{1}{2^{k}}-1) \cdot 2^{k} \)
\ (= \lim_{k\rightarrow +\infty} (\sqrt[2^k]{a}-1) \cdot 2^{k} \)
\ (= \lim_{k\rightarrow +\infty} (\underbrace{\sqrt{\cdots\sqrt{\sqrt{a}}}}_{k\times}-1) \cdot 2^{k} \) \ ((K\in \MATHBB {N}) \)
The value of this equation is very good, as long as the square is continuously open the line. Try to make \ (k=8\), calculate the \ (ln{2} \):
The calculated value is \ (0.694086413 \), in fact \ (ln{2} \approx 0.693147 \), error \ (0.000939413 \), how, accurate enough? Calculate \ (Ln{3} \):
The calculated value is \ (1.100972987 \), in fact \ (ln{3} \approx 1.09861 \), error \ (0.00236299 \), slightly larger than just now. It can be proved that (x \) The closer \ (1 \), the approximate value of \ (ln{x} \) Calculated with this method is less than the error of the actual value. The following is a partial image of the function \ (y=ln{x} \) and \ (y= (\sqrt[256]{x}-1) \cdot 256 \) within the same coordinate system. As you can see, the fit is very good:
This is only the case when \ (k=8 \) is larger and more accurate. \ (k\). How's that for a good idea?
Calculate logarithm with Basic Mode's calculator