Certificate ~~~ Speaking of bad topics

Some comments about the research, those with evidence, and those with the research have all seen the completion of the ccnp. Here I want to say a few words to my friends. I am a network administrator. After MCSE + ccnp, I have long wanted to post this post, but I have never had time to sort it out, because during the time of chrysanthemum, I have seen a lot of questions and opinions on the certificate, and I want to talk about it here. it is silly to say that the purpose of learning Na was to learn more about some basic network devices. After the examination, I found that I had not learned anything, but I had to understand NP, I really don't understand why Cisco is taking the ccna examination. What is the use of it and how to earn the examination fee! You just need to test NP directly. 1. MCSE is useless without ccnp (or is not worth it. first of all, I don't know who the author of this idea is, but I know from various media that irresponsible comments from various media have produced this idea. In addition, with the unique test ability of Chinese people, many people misunderstand MCSE. we can note that there are many reports on MCSE in various media. What MCSE is a back-to-back question, which is obtained by Bible and MCSE cannot find a job, network Authentication Cisco leads cool and so on. Here I want to say responsibly: MCSE is definitely useful for ccnp and it is not a gold sign, it is estimated that the author of those comments will not even know the basic computer knowledge, but will not know how much money the examination training institution has received. First of all, will MCSE and ccnp be comparable? One is a network * System and the other is a basic network device. How can this problem be solved? Please give me a standard. Can I be proficient in MCSE after ccnp or CCIE is completed? Obviously, this is a ridiculous conclusion. Ask a CCIE question from AD, and then he says he doesn't know, does it mean that CCIE is inferior to MCSE? Obviously, this is also a ridiculous conclusion, but there are many people who are crazy about this. Article With relish, I cannot find any other reason except for my ulterior motives. second, ccnp passed the same way as Bible, but the 5000 ocean was a little too expensive. In fact, this proved Microsoft's value. So many people took the MCSE test because of his wide application scope, the difficulty of the exam is the same for MCSE and ccnp. at least I think so. from an application perspective, MCSE is more widely used than ccnp. Again, if you want to obtain a certificate to find a job for network management, read MCSE, if you want to learn ccnp through network (networking), it is so simple. Some people may ask why network integration is not mentioned? Sorry, I think network integration should be for MCSE, ccnp, CCIE, Novell, UNIX, exchangeserver ....... all of them are well understood to be competent. think about it. If you are only familiar with what exchanges, routes, and other things, what is the room for network management? Unless your company's routers and switches often break down and must be Cisco, how funny it is, right? But in fact, most companies' networks are prepared by third parties (such as what is known as network integration). If CISCO switches and routers are used, they are basically configured, and then sign a maintenance contract with you. Basically, these devices will not be broken. Unless you used a layer-3 switch, you may never need to configure those devices. Second, not every company uses Cisco devices. maybe someone will ask me, isn't ccnp worth learning? If you are very interested in network technology and want to be a real network technical engineer, you must learn ccnp. Moreover, this is just the beginning. both MCSE and ccnp are essential for getting started, with different focuses. Moreover, they are complementary and allow you to troubleshoot problems from a more comprehensive and in-depth perspective, because certification exams have limitations and one-sidedness. also, is there a lot of network management required in the world, or is there a lot of networking? You don't have to say that .... if the number of ccnp and MCSE is the same, you can see which one is more useful. A small quantity or a high level of difficulty does not mean a high level of technology. The reason why pandatv is a national treasure is inseparable from its deteriorating adaptability. why does MCSE repeat repeatedly in China? In addition to the reasons mentioned above, there are too many companies, as well as network administrators and executives of many well-known large companies keen to use XP, what kind of fashionable new products do you want to buy, there is no way to use 2000 of network connections between zookeeper and zookeeper, what is the use of MCSE if the peer network is connected? Do not use network integration to scare people. if every company that uses 2000 of the network implements core technologies such as ad, the number of MCSE is far from enough. unfortunately ...... being proficient in MS products will certainly bring you good job opportunities. Others can only look at yourself. secondly, from a technical point of view, Windows is only produced by Microsoft. There are few similar competing products and the market share is incomparable. In contrast, Cisco has Huawei in China. In other words, china can produce the same vrouters and switches as Cisco. What about * system? Which technology is high? I don't want to talk about it anymore. if Microsoft and Intel or AMD work together to produce routers and switches, NP, ie certificates and Cisco shares will be available in the toilet just around the day. after completing the NP course, I found that most of the content is configuration and rules. It is strange that why can't Cisco do it without graphical interface configuration? Still too lazy. the ccnp Optical examination fee is 5000 oceans. I really don't know how much money Cisco has earned in examination training. in addition, it is just a joke about the network engineer examination recently launched by China to cultivate compound talents in light of the shortage of vendor certification. The lessons tell us that there are hundreds of people in the school, but it is not easy to understand, I know everything. I know everything without tables. Maybe I don't know anything. in two years, I can get NP, MCSE, Novell, Unix MCSD .... why do I need to take an exam for network engineers? Isn't there enough lessons for so many compound talents in the university? If I have the opportunity, I will go to CCIE for purely technical purposes. I didn't plan to develop in this network industry. Do you still remember the DOS, UNIX, or Novell era, what network engineers did at that time seemed to be much simpler than the current network. Just a few years later, NP, Se, and IE are just as proud, the only constant truth in the IT industry is change. experience is only useful when you have been engaged in this industry. There is only new technology, and there is no eternal experience. (This is my ten years of experience) 2. whether the paper certificate is useful. would you like to ask a question first? Is a college diploma useful? What are you doing in the last few months of the College Entrance Examination? The official website is review and sprint. we call it a simulated body or a question. I don't want to laugh at these questions in 50 steps. what is the purpose of the admission ticket? I think this question is worth studying. This is a big misunderstanding. Just like going to college, most people aim to have a good future and a good job, but I don't want to face such a reality. It's hard for college students to find a job. Why? Do we not need talents in China? The answer is no. There is only one possibility. After you graduate from college, you are not a human resource. At least you do not agree with it in the society. Similarly, if you get MCSE or ccnp, is it a human resource? I think everyone should know the answer. the key is what you want to get in the ticket. If the certificate can really bring you a lot of salary and work, what means can you get without passing points? I don't have to say much about it. if you want to find a good job with a certificate, once and for all, I will tell you, first, you have chosen the wrong line. second, you will never find a good job. it is hard to imagine that there is still a substitute examination service. What is the purpose? It is better to mix up a diploma of what shit University unpopular Major. The validity period is long and it will not be revealed. of course, the problems in Bible are classic problems. It is helpful for both learning and practical work. Do Microsoft and Cisco not know Bible? Joke. You can think about why the question bank is not frequently changed. in a word, learning is for use, not to prove or show off anything. You cannot prove anything by using certificates. the capabilities are provided to you by yourself. They are not related to certificates. The valuable certificate value is not related to your ability. The key is that your knowledge and technical value are not worth the money. there is no better reason to study new technologies. just like in my interview, when I took out the certificate, the interviewer did not read it, and then asked many professional questions, which were all learned during the examination. so, don't take the certificate too seriously. The key is what you learned.