China-EU value differences in national concepts

Recently, people are talking about the Olympic torch passing through Kazakhstan, Russia, Britain, France, and the United States ...... Of course there are Tibetan independence. In sasttan and Russia, no Tibetan independence hinders the torch transfer, but in Britain and France. Is Russia independent of Tibet?
Measures can be taken to protect the Olympic torch. security checks and suspicious investigations may be carried out within five kilometers of the torch, A little protection is only within the 5-meter range of the torch, and even more, the Tibet independence can directly access the torch transmitter. Different countries adopt different protective measures to reflect their attitudes towards China and their values.
In terms of national concepts, Europe may have the greatest difference with China. The EU is the product of a diluted country. The main force of the EU is France and Germany. They will not hesitate to promote the development of the EU, of course, public opinion and the media are also virtually helping their citizens to go to the state and talk about the concept of the State. China is trying to strengthen the concept of a country, and national unity is paramount. At this time, the Tibet incident emerged. How should the media of the European Union report? Of course, they report on their values. The values are right or wrong, and there is no right or wrong for an incident. If everyone has different positions, everything becomes different and hard to understand.
In addition, the choice of values is in line with the basic interests of all ethnic groups. For example, China, Russia, and the United States cannot split countries. Their vast land and large population are their advantages in the world. With the development of history in Europe, their advantages in the world will no longer exist. France and Germany will no longer have the previous glory. They will also become vast land with a large population, if the vast land is vast, resources are abundant. If there is a large population, there is sufficient consumption, but they cannot use war any more. Therefore, it is a good choice for the small countries around them to engage in the European Union, to achieve Alliance integration, we need to remove the original national concept.
If a small country gets better in this world, one is to make a big payment, and the other is to build a coalition. You can't keep up with the big ones. If you change the funds, you can get more benefits from Georgia. National independence, I think any powerful nation will choose independence, which will be more free and more profitable.
The difference between China and the EU in the concept of national values may be that they do not return. If the basic interests do not change, the value orientation will not change easily.

Nothing to write. It only represents my ignorance!