CMM (peer review)

In fact, the peer review rules are simple, but they are the most important part of software development quality assurance. Unlike other reviews, peer review reviewers have a fundamental understanding of the objects to be reviewed, it has a similar technical background with the author of the reviewed object. In this way, it is easier to discover the defects and problems of objects, and learn more knowledge and thinking from peers.
The peer review process is very simple. It is best to select appropriate personnel for review in the form of meetings. There should be records and explanations, and the discovered defects should be tracked and resolved. During the review process, the problem should be classified and classified. At the same time, the source analysis should be performed for the problem so that the root cause of the problem can be found in the review. At the same time, the problem can be solved, and empirical avoidance can also be performed from the root cause. This is the most important practice for software development.
The review objects (periodic or periodic review) can be described in a general manner, and reviewers (commentator, author, recorder, etc.) can be selected for review at a meeting, at the same time, we should track the detected defects. If the problem is serious or cannot be solved at this meeting, we should prepare for another meeting.