7.31 ppqa, weekly meeting 8.1nicle.zhao consultant answers the following questions: 1. There are multiple sub-projects in custody, and whether the PA of each sub-project needs to be improved. No. Keep the project as a whole only requires integrity as a whole. For example, if Q & A tickets are missing for some sub-projects, only some sub-projects are available. 2. For Gg in PA, how is gg2 implemented in Level 2? Is it required to fully implement GG 2 and gg3 in level 3. Gp2.1 in order to plan and execute, we need to have a policy. In the ossp/01_policy/macro technology company's articles of association, we define gp2.2 to plan the process and require PA implementation, gp2.3 can be included in the Project Plan to provide resources, such as human resources, computers, and so on. gp2.4 requires the assignment of responsibilities, and corresponding personnel are responsible for gp2.5 training personnel, configuration Management should be performed on gp2.6 for the personnel involved in this process improvement, configuration Management for the entire process domain gp2.7 stakeholder identification and involvement in gp2.8 supervision and control of the process gp2.9 objective evaluation compliance ppqa supervision gp2.10 senior manager review means to inform the senior manager of what is done the result of the things gp3.1 is the definition process, which means, each process domain requires a standard (partially completed) gp3.2 to collect improved information. This means that we need to establish feedback information (gladoffice) for each process domain. in IPM, sp1.1 defines the project process requirements. Output: The project definition process, whether the project should be This is added to the IPM of Process & Product ckecklist in level 3: Project definition process book. The project definition process can be included in the project plan. 8.2 create a third-level checklist OPF template. For more information, see 8.3ppqa issue confirmation, problem submission, and email notification pm. pl adds content statistics to the content of the letter; ppqa workflow: QA ---> enter the NC report, problem report ---> Publish a problem (Thursday) -----> receive feedback -----> confirm in person (next wedday) discuss how to confirm issues found by qa. the weekly meeting 8.4 revised the Issue Report to add a change history page to the Issue Report, and added the change history table, which should be filled in by persons updated by the week; summary of the ppqa three-level checklist, which has completed the preparation of the IPM part in the 50% third-level checklist, ppqa, rekm, OPF, and IPM parts.
