Common file Systems:

Common file Systems:
EXT4 (Linux)/xfs (SGI)/jfs (IBM)/btrfs (Oracle)/zfs (SUN)/reiserfs/hfs+ (Apple)/ntfs (ms)/fat32 (ms)/exfat (MS)
Apple does not use ZFS for reason analysis:
ZFS requires a large amount of memory for file system operations, and the target user is a large enterprise workstation and server, not an iOS device. In addition to the acquisition of Sun by Oracle and Oracle's long-term investment in ZFS's competitive offerings, Apple may find the future of ZFS unclear.
Http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/linux-a-unix/40-ext3-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-btrfs-filesystem-comparison-on-fedora-18.html
The conclusion of Ilsistemista's test is still very objective:
However, some obvious recommendations emerge from the observed patters:
1. If you plan the use of MySQL or PostgreSQL, use EXT4 as you can not go wrong with it. However, stay away from BTRFS;
2, for large file installation (as VM hosting system) or direct I/O, go with XFS.
BTRFS shows some big improvement that is remarkable.
However, I won't use it for critical data as it and its fsck is relatively young.
Simply put, the database application is recommended to use EXT4, large file Application (virtualization) is recommended to use XFS (from the RHEL7 default file system for XFS to verify the correctness of the side), and Btrfs does have a great upgrade, but not recommended for the application of critical data.

Common file Systems: