Compare Phpcms with Dedecms

Comparison of Phpcms and Dedecms

?

Now make a website is more and more easy, a lot of companies and personal webmaster began to use Content management system, in the CMS, especially the PHP cms, it is flourishing, of course, the quality is uneven. At present, the domestic more popular have dedecms and Phpcms, the following Chinese technology on these two CMS to do a simple comparison.

?

First from the user interface, that is, management background, the first is to login, dedecms login box Below a few ads, really called people upset, look uncomfortable. Of course, after all, people rely on this craved meager income to develop such a powerful CMS system. PHPCMS Login Interface There is no advertising, Shanda is not short of this little money. When the main interface into the background, DEDECMS is a bit shabby, the interface is not very gorgeous. At this point, phpcms do very well, the atmosphere, gorgeous.

?

From the perspective of use, the operation of the DEDECMS to focus on the left, the regulations are very clear. Phpcms the first level of navigation on the top, two-level navigation on the left, but when the choice is finished, but there is no corresponding instructions, often make the user do not know which navigation, and, phpcms in the navigation automatically pick up the function, feel like a chicken, every time he put away, I am doing the operation will be disrupted , not as good as without this function, perhaps my browser is widescreen, even if not, still feel the right editable area is not small.

?

From the template development, dedecms for the novice webmaster, and even the computer enthusiasts do not know the programming can, and, dedecms the label is not allowed to program (except {dede:php}), is completely template label operation, the introduction is very simple, of course, this is at the expense of customization at the cost. Phpcms template production, but also sampled the Dede agreed way, tabbed, but this is more than dedecms looser, you can embed PHP code inside, you can program inside the template, although this is a big taboo of software development, but the flexibility of the template increased significantly, Users have more permissions and ways to achieve their desired effect.

?

SEO, finish the website, if others do not come to visit, or can not find your site, it is too face, and no income. In terms of SEO, these two CMS do are very good, the most common keywords and descriptions have, and is for each page. By default, you can set the file name generated by the page (add a little, these two CMS can generate static HTML page, which is also very helpful to SEO). Phpcms relative to dedecms some shortcomings, the SEO optimization of the site is not dedecms design good, dedecms can be very simple in the background control URL generation, and rename, and Phpcms seemingly very complex, the most important is the official do not give a little detailed description.

?

Forum activity level, if the use of dedecms encounter problems, you can go to any forum post, soon someone reply, its forum activity is not generally high. And Phpcms, after all, this product is a grand development, you ask customer service bar, dare not, I believe most people are like me, with the free. So can only be honest to the forum post, I hope someone answers, but the forum is far less active than Dedecms, and Phpcms also maintained at the same time two versions, a 2008 (listen to this name, Shanda is too lazy bar, 4 years not updated), a V9.

?

Other aspects, many people leave Dedecms and turn to Phpcms, there is a very important aspect, that is phpcms there is a Dede does not have the function--station group, that year I was, from a webmaster forum to see the concept of the station group, looked at the DEDECMS has been used is very disappointed, Decisive Google a bit support station group of CMS, and then transferred to the PHPCMS door.

?

Summary, compared so many, two CMS are all the same, in fact, for users, or use habits, when we get used to a tool, naturally will be handy.

?

This article transferred from: http://my.oschina.net/hualai/blog/75561

