First, user simulation:
Full emulation of the end user, exclusive screen, can only open an exclusive instance. Testcomplete and QTP are similar. Second, UI component support: Selenium support the main components, but some events, methods and object properties support is not enough, QTP provides good support, through the charging plug-in, provides a
C#. Nine, with test management AH tool integration: QTP and can be HP quality Center and testdirector integration. Selenium does not support the Web at this stage. X. Supported application types: QTP support (DOTNET,VB, Powerbuilder, TCL/TK), selenium support for the web. XI. supported operating systems/platforms: Selenium supports Python,java, so it can be cross-platform. QTP only Supports
。 12, Script creation difficulty easy: QTP is quite easy, selenium to be difficult, but also can. 13, technical support: QTP to be a little more good. 14, Cost: QTP is probably the low season 5000 dollars, selenium free. XV, test development environment: selenium richer. 16, development process integration: QTP does not support, selenium can easily use cruise tools and so on. 17, Summary: Above selenium 1.* and QTP comparison. Selenium is in rapid development, the integration of the Webdriver Selenium 2.0 official version will be launched in 2011, then will be resolved to upload files and many other shortcomings. Selenium is expected to be a 5-year
The supremacy of the market, QTP, because of its availability and good support, will continue to exist.
Comparison of automated test tools selenium and QTP