Comparison of Zabbix and Nagios

Only these two monitoring systems are used in the production environment, and the following comparisons are made:

Nagios:

Advantages:

1, can monitor a lot of agreements: (Http,ftp,ssh,smtp,pop3,smtp,mysql)

Mail or SMS notification, the proxy client can run in many places

2, fault jitter detection

3, a lot of plug-ins to use

Disadvantages:

1, file-based configuration, inconvenient expansion, poor readability, management time, how many services may need to monitor how many files.

2, the lack of integrated graphics, although combined with cacti, is not the best solution, the interface is only an independent way to exist

3, there is no comprehensive support for SNMP or IPMI industry standards.

4, the Web interface is basically read-only

5, for many plug-ins it does not use the corresponding document

Zabbix:

Advantages:

1, simple configuration, you can automatically discover servers and network equipment.

2. Integrated image

3, built-in a lot of complex inspection

4, topology diagram design (v1.8 above)

5, can monitor a lot of agreements: (Http,ftp,ssh,smtp,pop3,smtp,mysql)

Mail or SMS notification, the agent client can run in many places, can be no agent monitoring

Monitor modularity.

Monitor log files and machine reboot.

Customize the monitoring view.

Real-time SLA level reports, images.

6, Zabbix distributed monitoring and web centralized management functions

Disadvantages:

1, installation slightly complex, but the client is very convenient

2, upgrade words, not very convenient

3, no fault jitter detection.

4, the Web interface requires more mouse operation.

Reference: Http://workaround.org/try-zabbix

More Wonderful content: http://www.bianceng.cnhttp://www.bianceng.cn/soft/tools/