Comparison of several online text editors

 

I have been searching for an online text editor for the past few days and tried some of them. Some of them are recorded below:

A foreign website records a comparison table covering almost all WYSIWYG online Editors:
Http://www.geniisoft.com/showcase.nsf/WebEditors

Open-source community websites in China record frequently used online editors
Http://www.open-open.com/ajax/Editor.htm
Http://www.oschina.net/project/lang/28? Tag= 172

Several ASP. NET online text editors
Http://hi.baidu.com/sunny17/blog/item/6e3b931c5bf09d8f86d6b682.html

First, I think it is worth using:

1. FCKeditor

I don't need to talk about how he is doing. There are a lot of online resources, but there is a size of nearly kb ~~~

2. xheditor

This control seems to be used by a few people, but it looks good! JS + CSS + picture a total of 50 K, small ah, Chinese!

3. tinymce

The online rating is very high. It is worth a try, but it is relatively large. It is nearly kb in Chinese!

4. xinha

The online rating is also high, and it is worth a try. However, there are more than 120 kbit/s ~~~

5. cuteeditor

It is said that csdn uses this and charges fees, but there are cracked versions.

6. kindeditor

Beautification is good. If you are interested, you can have fun. It is very easy to use, 70 ~ 80 K!

7. htmlarea
Functions are similar. You can give it a try.

8. cross-browser Rich Text Editor

Small. The total volume cannot exceed 40 kb. Try it.

9. sinaeditor
Sina editor should be the most user-friendly Editor, which is simple and generous and easy to use and powerful. But the size is good. Let's check it out ~~

below is what I think is average (personal feeling !)

1. innovastudio WYSIWYG editor

fees

2. ewebeditor


3. jwysiwyg

although small, it is difficult to use

4. wymeditor
the style is not easy to see, and I do not like it ~~

5. openwysiwyg

poor style, nearly 100 k

6. free Rich Text Editor

it is quite difficult to use. A special HTML page is used to add a table, maintenance is too complicated

7. markitup

"WYSIWYG"

Summary: The editors that I think are worth using generally have complete help documents andCommunityWith continuous development and recent updates, it is convenient and flexible to use. It supports multiple definition methods, what you see is what you get, and is secure and fast in coding,ProgramThe interface supports Chinese characters. The interface style is beautiful and has complete functions.

If you want to select a feature that is powerful and popular, you can select FCKeditor and tinymce, but the price is large. It is worth considering in terms of performance. If the function requirement is not very high, you can also select xheditor or

Kindeditor, of course, has smaller ones, such as jwysiwyg or damn small Rich Text Editor. However, it is inconvenient to use and is worth the candle.

PS: IfCodeYou can use a jquery plug-in: highlighter, which encapsulates non-jquery versions of highlighter for convenient use!