If AMD declines or declines in the next year or two, it may be because the demand for PC performance growth has entered the platform stage.
My PD 820 hasn't changed for a long time; on the one hand, it's because it's poor, and on the other hand it's not necessary.
When it comes to a very slow software, I know this is because it's not going to continue to use it; maybe there are only a few areas where performance requirements continue to grow.
If this is the case, we certainly do not need the kind of competition and situation to stimulate rapid progress.
Therefore, AMD's future trend may provide a basis for judgment.
(Do not take the increasingly popular large-scale computing as an example. In addition to the tasks faced by supercomputing, horizontal scaling may be enough)
What about GPU or other "general" targeted computing devices?
This is an on-demand configuration method that can reduce costs for new demands.
Groups outside mainstream users seem to be segmented.
Software abstraction can reduce the programming difficulty of specific types of tasks and improve the hardware cost-effectiveness through special design.
Well, it sounds like a reasonable solution.
In fact, there are two barriers: one is an easy-to-use interface, and the other is a reduction in the threshold for hardware design, production, and sales.
Another thing: Is Google's brand reputation reliable and influential?
I will always try New Coca-Cola products. But what about Google's Chrome or CF recommendations in the upper right corner?
This depends on the growth rate of statistics.
If this speed is too slow, it means that the so-called reputation and influence of Google has been difficult to overcome some small obstacles.
That is to say, no matter what Google is at last, we have been played by the media again.
Let's go back to the first thing. If the situation develops like that, it indicates that a new round of mining needs will be the next stage.
This is a task that tests the creativity of all mankind. Perhaps, the golden age is approaching.
However, we have another possibility: with the existing knowledge of all humans, we have encountered bottlenecks in CPU technology development.
Performance: either party can only use price reduction rather than better features (or actually reduce costs) to attract consumers.
As a result, the development will lead to an unbearable double-win situation for everyone. As a result, the lagging party is eliminated in advance.
To solve this problem, we can only make major breakthroughs in basic disciplines.
We are too accustomed to the rapid development of IT technology. When it becomes the same as the sanitary napkin, we feel wrong.
But this day will surely come.
What is the current situation? It may be closer to the coexistence of two possibilities. Of course, there may be nothing: further observation is needed.