Deep analytic two-in-one Test distribution tool pre.im and TestFlight

Speaking of the mobile application of the beta distribution platform, many developers first think of is foreign testflight. But recently, a test platform in China Testin also launched a platform for the distribution of beta pre.im, by the developers of the pursuit. Here, let's take a deep look at the difference between the old platform TestFlight and the rising star pre.im so that developers can better choose the right beta distribution tool for themselves.

650) this.width=650; "src=" Http://articles.csdn.net/uploads/allimg/150805/165_150805181633_1.jpg "width=" 554 " Border= "0" height= "311" style= "border:none;vertical-align:middle;"/>

Language environment

This is the most intuitive difference between the two, testflight from the login interface to help documents are all in English environment, pre.im is all Chinese. Here's a comparison of help documentation.

However, if the developer has no language requirements, this is not a point of the two PK.

Conclusion: flat, look at their preferences

Platform Support

Prior to Apple's acquisition, TestFlight supported both Android and iOS platforms, but it naturally supported iOS only after the acquisition. This pre.im to have a little advantage, two platform developers can be used to meet the needs of Android developers on the distribution, as well as the different types of interface experience feedback, crash logs and other requirements.

In addition, TestFlight only supports iOS8 and above, and pre.im does not have this limitation.

Conclusion: Pre.im wins, takes care of Android Developer's needs and iOS no version limit

Operation Steps

This should be the most important thing every developer wants to know, and in general, the beta test steps on TestFlight are: first, you need to have an app Record on itunes Connect before you test it, and if not, you'll need to create one yourself first. The next test process is a bit complicated, and interested students can sign in with the developer account to try it out. After the beta application has been collated, the tester will receive the corresponding message, open the mobile testflight application via email and install the test. (If the TestFlight application needs to be installed).

The following is to say is pre.im, this aspect of doing is more in line with the use of domestic developers habits, the method is simple. Simply upload your app to the Pre.im platform, and you'll get a download link and QR code that can be transmitted to testers through or via SMS, which is a much simpler way to share. In addition, the platform provides a way for dummies to acquire device Udid, and developers will no longer have to explain what Udid is and how to get it.

Conclusion: Pre.im wins, caters to the developers ' pursuit of simple psychology

Size of test personnel

TestFlight the testers into internal and external members, both of which are theoretically able to use your app during the testing phase, although the so-called internal is primarily a member of the technical development or management of your development team on itunes Connect. A maximum of 25 internal members can be invited. The upper limit for the external members is 1000 people. One thing to note here is that before you invite outside members to participate in the test, you need to go through Apple's review, but this review is a little uncertain.

Accordingly, PRE.IM does not have audit restrictions, and developers can invite testers to meet their needs. This is good for Android developers in addition to iOS. Android developers can be distributed through pre.im, which is a good point to build the seed users in the early stages.

Conclusion: Pre.im, if the iOS developers do not mind the audit time, in fact, the two are comparable

Access speed

Since TestFlight's servers are abroad, the number of local developers will be affected when accessing and uploading or downloading applications, and will be slower. Here, Pre,im is much stronger, because its server is in the country, access, upload the speed to be better.

Conclusion: Pre.im wins, the server is located in the domestic

Enterprise Certificate Signing Package service

If you already have your own business certificate, then there is nothing to compare. If not, maybe pre.im can offer you some help.

After you submit the IPA to pre.im, pre.im can package the app as an enterprise certificate signature, and then support all IOS device installations. This approach is more friendly to small and medium-sized developers who do not have a business account, and they can eliminate the hassle of finding and adding udid to test users and making app distribution easier.

Conclusion: If you don't need an enterprise certificate, there's no contrast.

The following is attached to a testflight and pre.im function Comparison table, we can according to their own needs, to determine who is more suitable for their own.

650) this.width=650; "src=" Http://articles.csdn.net/uploads/allimg/150805/165_150805181550_1_lit.png "width=" 550 " Border= "0" height= "356" style= "border:none;vertical-align:middle;"/>

Deep analytic two-in-one Test distribution tool pre.im and TestFlight