Development of entrepreneurial companies

I recently saw an article about the development of entrepreneurial companies on the Internet, which I think is very good and useful for reference. I will extract the article below: 1. The most important thing is to share the same mind in the same boat.
Unlike large companies that have a strong economy as the backing, start-ups can offer very high salaries as bait to attract talents. On the contrary, start-ups tend to be economically stretched, apart from some of the most basic daily expenses, start-ups can save money and save money, and treat team members as low as possible. A good start-up company doesn't mean you don't want to give it, but you can't afford it, under such objective conditions, how can we attract talents to serve the company? The most important thing is to look for people who share the same interests and interests with the company's development, and it is best to investigate his current economic situation in advance. If he is not busy at the moment, it is best not to take it seriously, because he may have to give up his hobbies for financial reasons in a short time and succumb to money. Like-minded people will be able to share difficulties with the company in the future operations. Any company must go through the establishment, development, growth, and growth of the company, which will inevitably lead to a climax, there must also be a low point. In the peak period, the loyalty of employees must be relatively high, while in the low tide, some of them will not be firm, members who have no confidence or interest in the company's development direction may leave the company. It is said that when Baidu was in a low position, its employees paid half of their salaries. At that time, many people left, in the end, most of the things we stick to are those who are interested in searching and are confident that the company will develop like-minded people in the future. This time, the organization created the studio and encountered the same problem. The studio members, in terms of structure and personal level, are both very powerful teams, it includes technical and planning personnel with many years of work experience, researchers with a solid foundation, and technical support personnel. However, in terms of project selection, it is difficult for team members to achieve unity. Most of them are also different in our interests.
2. Too many people or Formalism
Some start-up companies are often full of ambition in the early stage, and feel that they should be as formal as they are in the big company. They have experienced two such companies. When there is no clue about a project, three testers were recruited. As a result, these testers had nothing to do, and the boss was hard to get the money and do not work, so they forced them to look for problems. The result was that these testers were nitpicking all day, pick the bones in the eggs, and change the buttons on the webpage to this place today. If it looks inappropriate tomorrow, it will be changed back. The other one was even more terrible. During his tenure, he saw at least 10 systems. None of them went online, and all of them were in their hands to entertain themselves. Then, the market: planning: the approximate ratio of technology was, the product has not yet been developed, but there are obviously insufficient developers. In this way, there must be a lot of requirements in the early stage of the product, but there are few implementations. The supply and demand are not directly proportional, affecting the successful launch of the product.
3. Team members should open the hierarchy, and there should be no too many advantages
Every team hopes to recruit some experts, but the more a team is built, the higher the efficiency of the team. In an old saying, everyone has a skill that they are good at. danale has a certain technical advantage, however, it is very likely that there are problems in dealing with people. For example, some technically advanced people tend to be eccentric, Maverick, and stubborn. These can be said to be their advantages. They are exactly these characteristics, they achieved their technical accomplishments, but also influenced communication between people. However, some team members are extroverted and active, and may not be too persistent in technology. However, they are very good at communicating with people and have a faster grasp of their business. In a team, if they are experts of almost the same level, they often have some disputes over how to solve the problem, and because of their similar levels, therefore, it is difficult to persuade the other party, resulting in endless debate and affecting the normal progress of the project. A reasonable team should be like a gold tower. danale only has one or two teams, and then there are some at all levels, which can also reflect the principles of complementary advantages.
4. The founder of the Team also noted: "Both listening and listening are clear, believing is dark"
In the early stage of start-up, it was true that family members and friends had a better unity. However, when the team grew bigger, it was supposed to be a matter of genius, so they could not trust some people, because even their relatives and friends, standing on different courtesy positions often produces different opinions and decisions. If a team is mostly friends and family members, the team seems to be a family business, other people in this team may worry about being squeezed out, and their personal abilities cannot be developed fairly. Therefore, they will decrease their loyalty to the team until they finally leave. The formation of a vicious circle makes it very difficult for this team to absorb fresh blood. Once heard Huang Ming, the boss of Texas huangming solar group, say that he was crying, and then he said that some old people are in the dark, after they have achieved a certain position, there will usually be a certain degree of conservative and negative, resulting in a decline in the company's performance. Although these people are co-founder of their own, but he still chose to quit them, in fact, he is not willing to do this from the bottom of his mind, but considering the fact that the overall situation of the company has failed, this reflects the above principle.