Dialogue between reposted articles and the customer service of Peking University qingbird

I saw my article reposted ON THE Beida qingbird website, and wrote my article "instructor.

This violation:

State Council of the People's Republic of China
468th

Regulations on Protection of Information Network Communication Right

Article: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2006-05/29/content_294000.htm

The reprinted Article URL is:

Http://www.nj-test.com/Article/rjcsgj/200709/464.html

For example:

 

For the original article, see:

The following is a dialogue with the customer service staff of Peking University Qingdao:

Instructor Fang said: We are glad to provide you with online consulting on the software testing engineer course! Do you want to consult our courses? You said: No. You said: I saw my article on your website. But it was written by your own instructors. You said: http://www.nj-test.com/Article/rjcsgj/200709/464.html Fang teacher said: Yes you said: http://blog.csdn.net/zeeslo/archive/2007/08/21/1753392.aspx you said: My original blog. Instructor Fang said: I know what you said: What should I do? Instructor Fang said: This is not my decision. Besides, you have no special evidence. This is also true. I wrote this myself. All copied. You said: You can ask the person you uploaded. Instructor Fang said: I am not very clear about who you should ask. Instructor Fang said: I will tell you this question as soon as possible by our website administrator. You said: Thank you. I want to find other sites. Instructor Fang said: We will indicate the source on the website. Sorry for any offense. Instructor Fang said: however, this proves that your article is well written. You said: some websites are turning around like this. However, Peking University testing is not a small website. It cannot be the same as those that do not matter. In the testing age, 51testing has all my copyright statements. Instructor Fang said: Sorry, you must pay attention to it later: I have saved the above conversation. For future query. You said: if the problem persists, I will put it on my blog. Instructor Fang said: OK

The above is the conversation three days ago. This blog article can be reproduced. You only need to specify the source. If you write your own data directly, it seems that it is not good. The following is a reprinted copy of several other websites. URL: http://www.dpc-bj.com/newsdetail.asp? Id = 223

URL:

Http://www.msnshow.cn/testing/2007/18236.htm

There are other things that will not be listed one by one.