Differences between training institutions and universities

I used to give students the following metaphor: a university is a supermarket, but this supermarket pays first in a certain period. You have to pay before you come in. After you come in, you can ask for it as needed, of course, there is no limit on the amount of knowledge, but there is a limit on the shopping time. Every year, you will be "renewed". You can stay in the supermarket for a maximum of eight years, if you want to go out, OK. If you want to get less, you will not be able to complete the business. (Of course, it is not ruled out that supermarket administrators with "good intentions" have a Toto relationship, if you get less, you can also "graduate"). If you get more, encourage, and sometimes bring a big red flower (a bunch of "excellent" and "Top 10" titles ), some still have material rewards (scholarship, scholarship, and subsidy, and now the outstanding student scholarship will be able to pay the tuition fee). This metaphor is more relevant to the individual, at least to the students, there is a cost for going to college. The cost is the hard-earned money of the parents and their precious youth. When going to college, you must take the initiative to ask for a return (Note: This word is inappropriate. In order not to interrupt your thinking, make a mark) the reward is your knowledge reserve and ability cultivation. As to whether the reward is higher than the cost, whether it is "profit" or "loss" depends on society. There are many examples around me: the same tuition, the same university, the same graduation certificate, some students earn more than 0.2 million yuan after work, and some students "graduate = unemployed ", some students have a Five-Year gala to thank their alma mater. Some have a Five-Year gala to hate their alma mater, some praise, and some abuse ...... not that this society is too cruel, not that colleges and universities are too incompetent, but that the rules of "survival of the fittest" are too heartless.

Recently, after experiencing the employment training institutions that have been "flourishing" in recent years, I cannot help but feel that, with the same knowledge, "value" varies greatly in different environments!

Calm down, think carefully about the "Supermarket model" in front of you, and find that the "consumer psychology" is ignored. This supermarket is in different environments, the mentality of "consumers" is different. in colleges and universities, the idea of "mixed" is spreading, and the mentality of "60 minutes long live" occupies the mainstream, which is opposite to the normal consumption psychology, I feel that I am taking less things and can "cheat" the supermarket administrator. In training institutions, the idea of "snatching" has spread, and everyone has a strong initiative. They always feel that they cannot get a little better than others. The difference in "Consumption psychology" determines the final result. The quality of college classrooms and classes is unsatisfactory, and the enthusiasm of training institutions is high.

This is really confusing (it is not in line with the relevant theories of the Market Economy). They all pay "tuition fees" (4000 tuition fee per year for colleges and universities, and they can study more than 15 courses, in general, the training institution's tuition fee is between and 2 to 6 months. Why is the mentality quite different?

Speaking of this, many people will say that the university classroom knowledge is seriously out of touch with society, and training institutions are closely related to social needs. I do not agree with this. Now, colleges and universities are no longer closed. Taking my school as an example, more than 50% of the teachers are close to the society, by tracking the most cutting-edge technologies and theories through vertical and horizontal projects, we will not leave the society at all. Today there is also a medium-sized company that organizes employees and lectures in our upstairs labs, we are hiring lecturers in our department, talking about the content in the class, and doing experiments in the class.

There is another point of view, saying that the actual experience of teachers is too small and the theory and practice are separated seriously. This is also a very specific phenomenon. Let's talk about it as a teacher in the network engineering department, more than half of the teachers have worked in the school network center, and there is no such issue. They all have rich experience in network planning, construction, maintenance, and management, some teachers participate in enterprise-level training every year, such as software outsourcing, Oracle database, ccna, and 3G technology ".

Responsibility? I often see colleagues around me working on "Open Labs", organizing "interest groups", organizing their own experiences and providing them to students free of charge, and working overtime to add labs to students, preparing lessons all night ...... how many teachers in the training institution are still in the office after their work? How many of them will take the initiative to "work overtime?

What's the reason?

Ah, "why ?"

Speechless

Emotion

Still speechless afterwards

 

Please let me know if you have a better explanation!