[Cisco] Rip cannot achieve Load Balancing

Tag: rip

Three existing routers are connected in a ring. The configuration is as follows:

R1:

Interface ethernet0/0/0
IP address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0
#
Interface ethernet0/0/1
IP address 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0
#
Interface loopback0
IP address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
#
Rip 1
Network 1.0.0.0
Network 192.168.12.0
Network 192.168.20.

 

R2

Interface ethernet0/0/0
IP address 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.0
#
Interface ethernet0/0/1
IP address 192.168.23.2 255.255.255.0
#
Interface loopback0
IP address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
#
Rip 1
Network 2.0.0.0
Network 192.168.12.0
Network 192.168.23.0
Maximum load-balancing 1
#

 

R3

Interface ethernet0/0/0
IP address 192.168.13.3 255.255.255.0
#
Interface ethernet0/0/1
IP address 192.168.23.3 255.255.255.0
Null0
#
Interface loopback0
IP address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
#
Rip 1
Network 3.0.0.0
Network 192.168.23.0
Network 192.168.20.
Maximum load-balancing 1

 

 

Q: Which of the following routers cannot achieve load balancing between the two other routers? Which ones are there? Why?

This is suitable for you to use a simulator. Remember the role of maximum load-balancing 1-6, that is, control the number of Server Load balancer route entries on the current vro or l3sw.

If the number of entries is reduced, it is recommended that the IP address be small. I have not verified the IP address on the real machine or RFC, and keep it first.

This article from "old books often read New Ideas" blog, please be sure to keep this source http://ramboking.blog.51cto.com/3596215/1544892

[Cisco] Rip cannot achieve Load Balancing