Google has abandoned the soap API and is connected with others.

Since December 5, Google has no longer encouraged people to use the soap-style searching API, instead of Ajax.

There are three things worth noting here.

One is a definite sentence. Soap must be finished, at least on the public internet.

Of course, some people will use it in the enterprise, and may even become a rising trend in a period of time. It is not surprising that these things were originally spoof by "enterprise-level" people, after the failure of the masses, I had to return to "enterprise-level. However, a technology that was favored by many people before year 56 can only shake under the shelter of "enterprise-level" bureaucracy, waiting for a day to rest and wait, it is also a miserable evening scene.

It can be seen that it is very important to maintain a picky appetite. A lot of people (including me) had nausea when they saw soap on the first day, and those who kept their picky appetite had been suffering from nausea. They were not violent and uncooperative. However, there are also a few people who want to get down to it and get used to it by spitting out and following soap. The final answer reveals that this is indeed a superman, not Altman.

The second is a question. Google chooses ajax to expose APIs (in addition to searching and map service APIs). Does this mean that before the arrival of the real era of big web service integration, will there be an era of page-level Ajax service integration first?

This issue must be clearly explained. I think the future of the Internet is all basic services (login, indexing, search, MAP, storage, query, report, billing, transactions, comments, word segmentation, semantic analysis, images, videos, forums, blogs, all are provided by professional companies through Web services. For small and medium-sized websites, you only need to integrate the web services provided by these professional companies. You do not need to write a login authentication for each website, it is still plagued by security vulnerabilities. The question is, how do professional companies provide Web Services? Soap is doomed, but rest and AJAX can be selected.

Rest should be the best option, but recently there are several websites that expose their Web Services in Ajax style, such as JS-Kit.com, you can) the HTML page contains a piece of JavaScript to easily obtain an Ajax-style comment component. In other words, this website provides the Web Services Service for "commenting". Any website can delegate its comment function to this website. Now, Google uses ajax to expose its own search service. Will it be a breeze for a while?

Don't think it doesn't matter. Rest is server integration, while Ajax is client service integration. For example, I run a small website, in which all the basic services are entrusted to them by calling the web services of a large website. If rest integration is adopted, users must first contact me when accessing my website and then call Amazon and Yahoo! . If Ajax integration is used and the page is pushed to the user, it has nothing to do with me. When a user searches, the access request is directly sent to Google. If it is a fixed point, I don't even know what the user has done. Of course, the difference is not small.

I feel that the Ajax style does not comply with the game rules, and the majority of small and medium websites may not necessarily accept it, so it may not get angry. Let's see when Google launched a rest-style API.

Third, a reminder. It is hoped that Chinese Web enterprises will pay attention to the trend of web services and do not repeat the same mistakes of WPS.

At least from now on, on the internet, our domestic enterprises are doing well, and foreign giants cannot find the north. Many people are excited about this and have a great deal of enthusiasm, including myself. More than once, I have told more than one group of people that "China's Internet affairs must be solved by the Chinese ". But frankly speaking, the reason why foreign Internet companies are not doing well in China today is that there is not much secret in it. It is nothing more than failing to study the situation in China and failing to understand Mao Zedong thought deeply, improper employment and improper handling. Especially when employing people, they are still at the initial stage of looking at their origins, seeing their academic qualifications, and looking at their talents as their talents. So they will be overwhelmed at half past one, absolutely normal. However, as long as people work hard, these problems can always be solved. Once we get on the right track, the advantages of capital, technology, and especially in terms of technical standards can be leveraged. Therefore, for our domestic Internet companies, it is not long-standing to take care of them and take care of them to maintain their advantages.

Web servitization is a general trend. In the end, standard APIs of various web services will be developed. This is the next generation of technical standards. Whoever controls this standard can make a huge profit in the Web Service era. Let me describe this process. First, several major Internet vendors have released their respective web service APIs. In practice, they have tested and corrected them. After gradually maturing, they will discuss them together and set a standard. Then we will launch products, tools, books, promotion, and promotion of their "standards", which makes it very convenient for general people to follow this standard for websites or pages. Then millions of small and medium-sized websites and hundreds of millions of personal blogs will follow this standard, and you will not follow this standard, just like today's self-developed browser that does not support HTTP and HTML, no one can use it. Many of our companies are bored with their products, and once the products are finished, they are bored with money and are happy. They feel that making a fortune is the highest level, and there are not many technical strategies that can be raised. The speed of imitation is fast, and the process goes on and on. As a matter of fact, when foreigners fought the Korean War, they knew that they could not beat us, so they never fought with us. But there are more advanced ways to deal with us. GRASP financial capital with one hand, GRASP technical standards with one hand, and both hands should be hard. This is the killer of old imperialism. I have to repeat the WPS story? Some things are completely lost.

A small news, said so much, the program to write has been dragged on for two days did not write, Sin.