The reason why Windows failed I think that in addition to the Windows kernel is not advanced, the architecture is more vulnerable, I think Windows has no innovation ability, sitting in situ laurels. For example, MSN, before and QQ, but because of lack of innovation, 10几 year is still in place, and QQ has rapid, progress is very big, with the original system has completely different. How does the software system keep pace with the rapid development of software? As for WP, Microsoft did not do its own mobile phone, or will know that their system is not suitable for mobile phones. The problem of high power consumption is simply no solution. Windows says the PC market is unlikely to be weak, but this is a great opportunity for Sinox. Sinox is likely to beat windows in one swoop as a leader in the PC Operation market. Today's disruptive products are not uncommon. Of course it's hard for people to understand why Sinox can replace windows, but that's the best chance for Sinox. If everyone knows, Sinox still have a chance? I think the future Sinox development goal should be in the leading structure based on continuous innovation, the opponent far behind, in order to avoid hardware restrictions, will be alone or joint enterprise development Sinox hardware, so Sinox hardware is rich and perfect, do not let people say Sinox support hardware is not much. Of course, as Sinox Ecological department, will vigorously develop peripheral industries, such as mobile phones, game consoles, industrial computer, etc., but Sinox operating system is firmly in their hands. Development software on the Sinox system will be developed using a unique development language SEPL. The establishment of large-scale software outsourcing companies to undertake a large number of SEPL software development, to meet the needs of industrialized software development. SEPL development tools will be used as proprietary software as an in-house development tool because China is not suitable for generic software sales. If one day SEPL software development company production capacity is surplus, can advance to artificial intelligence and other fields, develop artificial intelligence system such as unmanned factory. Unmanned factories have emerged, and a large number of workers will be freed from the factories, they will be unemployed and the industrial revolution is over. Microsoft Windows open Source "True Lies"
Sun Yongjie April 08 08:11 share: Microsoft Windows Open source Category: Internet
Summary: A recent Microsoft Windows likely to open-source report in the industry caused a strong response, most of the comments analysis that Microsoft Windows open source because Microsoft in the current mobile device market (such as smart phones) poor performance and traditional PC (Windows PC) Industry is a wise choice to save oneself in the decline. Is that really the case?
A recent report that Microsoft Windows may be open source has generated strong repercussions in the industry, with most of the comments analyzing Microsoft Windows open source because Microsoft is performing poorly in the current mobile device market (such as smartphones) and traditional PCs (Windows PC) Industry is a wise choice to save oneself in the decline. Is that really the case?
The first thing we want to say is whether Microsoft has the necessary open source, that is, the current decline in the PC market and poor performance in the smartphone market is due to the closed source of Windows itself. In fact, the industry knows that the PC market is a lot of reasons, the weakness of user demand and the impact of tablets and smartphones are more important factors, but from the entire PC soft eco-environment, Microsoft's Windows still occupy irreplaceable location and advantage, although there are Apple's Mac X and Google Chrome The OS competes with it, but with little success, and more crucially, even the old rival Linux department, which Microsoft has been in the PC industry, has failed to shake Microsoft Windows's absolute lead in the PC industry, although Microsoft has also made a mistake (such as Vista's failure) that the industry has seen as fatal in the process. These are enough to prove that Microsoft Windows is competitive and perfect in the PC industry, so windows open source is at least as likely to improve Microsoft's competitiveness in the PC industry, and Microsoft has lost Linux in this industry. Once defeated the open source, but now itself to open source, this itself is full of contradictions is not it?
Then look at the industry criticized Microsoft's smartphone (including tablet) market. We think Microsoft's performance in this market is tepid, for many reasons, such as the previous focus on the mobile market strategy. Remember the sarcastic remarks of former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer on Apple's iphone listing? The second is the so-called System Fusion Strategy that Microsoft is aware of after the importance of the mobile market. Although the idea of convergence is good, the so-called Fusion strategy of Microsoft is not really a fusion of the unified Windows kernel until the launch of WINDOWS10. The key is that the traditional PC and mobile market represented by smartphones and tablets are completely different scenarios and approaches, which determine the technical difficulty and actual user needs of a system (including ecosystems) to take into account the cross-border experience, And that's one of the main reasons why Apple and Google are still using different systems in the mobile and PC markets today.
Another is the problem of Microsoft's development strategy in the mobile market itself. For example, choosing to work with Nokia until later, with multiple Nokia anti-water (such as the launch of its own Meego system of N9 mobile phones and Android-based mobile phones, etc.), in the time of delay, so that the industry for Microsoft in the mobile market of the Windows ecosystem to sway, more importantly, After acquiring Nokia, Microsoft's flagship low-cost strategy ($ 45 for mobile phone ASP) has made the fragile Microsoft mobile ecosystem more vulnerable. According to the relevant research analysis, the purchase of high-priced mobile phone users, more willing to pay for the application, and vice versa. The low-price strategy of Microsoft's phones makes it hard for users to buy apps, at least compared to Apple's iOS and Google's Android. But the resulting cascading effect is that it's hard for developers to get revenue from Microsoft's mobile ecosystem, which in turn affects their enthusiasm for developing apps for Microsoft and a vicious cycle.
For example, recently, as one of the hot weather applications for WP, Weather flow has been officially off the shelf from the App Store. Gergely Orosz, the app's developer, says the reason for this is that weather flow's data usage costs up to $1500 a month, and the developer Gergely Orosz gains from the software are $500 per month and are still falling. According to statistics, currently many of the mainstream applications on iOS and Android platforms have not been deployed to the Windows platform, even in the presence of the experience with the iOS and Android platform similar applications there is a gap.
From the above analysis is not difficult to see, Microsoft in the PC market downturn and in the mobile market tepid and Windows is closed source or open source is not directly related. So the next question is, what if Windows is really open source?
In the PC market, for example, the existing Windows ecosystem will be broken, and many applications will have to be re-used, which is undoubtedly the biggest blow to enterprise users who have relied on Microsoft, followed by a change in the use of Microsoft Windows open source. Remember the main reason for the poor performance of WINDOWS8 in the market? Users are not accustomed to, but do not forget that this is still in Windows overall development strategy and framework under the premise of the introduction of the system, and once open source can be imagined. In the mobile market, the industry can be a simple comparison of Google's Android, fragmentation will inevitably. The key is that Google failed to install its core app on the user's phone via Android, which was a big discount for Google's launch of Android, which is why Google has released Android one. That is, the system reclaims control over Android. But from the present view, the effect is not obvious, so-called spilt is this truth. But these will also make Microsoft's strategy to monetize its apps and services just look beautiful.
To sum up, we think Microsoft Windows open source whether in the PC, or the mobile market for Microsoft is more harmful than the advantages, and we need to specifically note that the so-called Microsoft Windows open Source is only a Microsoft technician, and in its discussion of open source section is only about the part of the Code open source, Let's not say that the employee is just saying that, even if the future Microsoft is really like it said open source, but everyone knows that some of the open source is at best a "pseudo-open source".
Microsoft Windows wants to save itself through open source, but a lifeline.
