Open source and open

Open source is indeed no longer popular. No matter whether you participate or not, whether it is not supported or not, whether it is profitable or not, it is booming. First of all, you must show your attitude: support and participation as much as you can. It is a hobby, but it is not optimistic about its business scenarios.
Another phenomenon is that the Open Source targets Microsoft intentionally or unintentionally. Is it an anti-rich mentality? If you think about it, it's not true. Open-source masters have already been refined by the world. They don't really appreciate billg's stock. What is that? Open to Microsoft!
From the underlying windows APIs support to the establishment of the COM component of the entire system, a Windows operating system shows the openness of Microsoft's system design. In addition, from the perspective of other Microsoft products and the development ecosystem of Microsoft, the powerful open design principle of Microsoft is an important reason for its undefeated position. So, is it a highly open software or a fully open source software that has money? Indeed, money, here I want to talk about commercial operations. I admit that as an open-source software, I don't mean $, but I just want the software to stay on the basis of a toy.
In the end, openness is just a software system design principle, while open source is actually a code management method.