Relativity between Oracle and SQLServer"

Welcome to the Oracle community forum and interact with 2 million technical staff. The author of this article, SeanMcCown, is a senior database worker who has been engaged in the database industry for 15 years. The current job is to answer database-related comments. The following is what SeanMcCown understands when answering comments. The content of SeanMcCown posted on the blog is as follows:

Welcome to the Oracle community forum and interact with 2 million technical staff> The author of this article, Sean McCown, is a senior database worker who has been exploring the database industry for 15 years. The current job is to answer database-related comments. Here is what Sean McCown understands in answering comments. The content of Sean McCown posted on his blog is as follows:

Welcome to the Oracle community forum and interact with 2 million technical staff> enter

Sean McCown, author of this article, is a senior database worker who has been engaged in the database industry for 15 years. The current job is to answer database-related comments. Here is what Sean McCown understands in answering comments.

The content of Sean McCown's blog is as follows:

I really disagree with some comments in the Community (some comments are very poor), and I want to answer them quickly and complete my work.

The first thing I want to talk about is something that worries me a lot. I have been engaged in the database industry for 15 years. Although I am not clear about all the knowledge of the database, I am still one of the best. Therefore, you should not remind me again that there is a difference between "SQL" and "SQL Server. I already know the difference. It is true that when posting a long article on the Internet, it is better for your audience to clearly understand what you are talking about. When talking about Oracle and SQL Server, I should be able to abbreviated SQL Server as SQL without writing all its spelling every time. If you are confused sometimes, I am sorry for this, but you should remember to understand what I mean. I am not talking about the SQL language. One guy even said that I should write Microsoft SQL Server. This is really good ...... However, when talking about Oracle, I didn't see any of you confused. Oracle is the name of a company. They have produced many products. No one told me via Email that I should call it Oracle Database 11g?

I think you already know what I mean. You don't have to write the full name every time. Well, this is what I want to talk about before getting started.

Now go to the topic. Some of you have made clear, clear, and thoughtful comments. Some others did not say anything substantive, but were still scolding. This does not matter. I will not pay too much attention to the latter.

Among them, very good comments come from Oracle practitioners. It is not surprising that the comments they wrote are very deep. They are a very smart group. They can prove that their opinions are correct, rather than being scolded.

The following scene is interesting to me. If we deploy a task on the MS (short for Microsoft) platform, we will probably get a similar solution. This phenomenon has been approved by many people, they also think so. If we deploy the same tasks on the Oracle platform as those on the MS (Microsoft abbreviation) platform, it is hard to find the answer. This is not to say that there is no solution for this task, but it is not as easy as it is on the MS Platform.

Maybe many people think this is just my statement, because they have never encountered any trouble asking for help on Oracle Database 9i/10g/11g. Maybe we are all right. It depends on your experience. In fact, there are a group of IT workers around me who post their troubles on their blogs. Most of them agree with my point of view. Most of these are the database administrators of some grocery stores.

However, what I want to declare is that although many people do not admit that it is difficult to find Oracle Database learning resources, in fact, MS learning resources are easier to obtain.

[1] [2] [3]