STL experience (1) -- why use STL

In the last project, I thought of using the MFC container class, so I kept the promise to come to a cobarray class. Because my project is used on the server side and has been running for many years, so it didn't take long for me to run, so I found a memory leakage problem. Shit, I almost checked my own section.CodeLater, I found that the cobarray class was used, but it was not released. It was very difficult to see msdn. It was not very good at solving problems such as memory release. So I am looking for another way to replace the cobarray class that I think is not very useful. My choice is STL.

Since it is determined that STL is used, but there are many STL, such as the built-in VC, stlport, etc. I checked the one that comes with VC, hisSource codeThe quality is indeed not flattering, so later I chose stlport and set it online.