What kind of management methods do we need?

Over the past few days, I have read Mr Cheng Junyi's "manage Three Kingdoms". A good book often gives people the desire to think about something after reading it. This book is so interesting that I want to write something now. I haven't written a script for two or three months. Although it's spam literature, I should have written something.

As early as three years ago, I read Master Cheng's "Three Kingdoms in boiling water". At that time, I had no feelings. I just read it as a funny novel. I have no idea when to read it.

Back to the question, "manage Three Kingdoms" focuses on two different management methods: fisherman management and gardener management. In terms of fisherman Management, Mr. Cheng believes that Cao is a good example. He knows how to use bait, hooks, and timing, but to some extent, it is equivalent to gambling. In contrast, the example of gardener management is Liu Bei, like a gardener, Liu Bei takes care of the whole garden so that everything grows properly. I am not a manager, not a management expert, or even an employee. I have a very short experience and I am not qualified to discuss whether this theory is correct. You can only talk about your thoughts at most.

I am still a student and a student who is about to enter the society. But what should I do? In the information age, what kind of information can be obtained from the Internet is still a little familiar with some social issues. I feel that under the current situation, it is impossible to achieve the management of gardeners. Now it is not a "Combination" era. The management of gardeners can only be achieved by small individuals. The overall situation is just like communism, it is beyond reach, and our enterprise does need this management method. When chatting with a few students, we often say that after finding a job, working for two years, and then finding a better company to change jobs. This explains what the problem is. A company has just cultivated you into a talent that hasn't really been used by you, so you can go to another company to serve others. Therefore, the current employer is very concerned about employee loyalty, and vaguely remembers that Zhuge Liang of "Three Kingdoms of boiling water" asked Liu Bei radish and big sticks to manage employees, in this section, we advocate that company leaders should do nothing and provide appropriate space for employees to achieve their own growth, so that they do not feel the existence of managers, I feel a little conflicted. I agree with the latter.

Enterprises should create an environment, which is an enterprise culture that we can talk about. The quality of corporate culture directly affects employee loyalty. The big environment has a small impact on the environment. If there is a problem with the company's culture, there will be problems with employees'> spiritual life and psychology. Although I am not very clear, what kind of culture does Huawei have? What is the authenticity of those news reports? If, as the outside world said, Huawei's culture is indeed problematic and is a serious problem. As a manager of an enterprise, you cannot only see the benefits. An enterprise should be 'people-oriented '. Of course, it is not human capital. human capital is not a long-term development method. I have not managed the company myself, but I have managed the team while working on projects in the school. Management is the knowledge of people getting along with each other. When we team up, we often think that strong cooperation is a good choice. Later, we found ourselves wrong. A truly powerful team is a dynamic team, and a truly powerful team is a complete whole. Each team member knows what they want to do and what they can do. Strong cooperation seems good, but the team members often cannot find their seats, and the Team will be dispersed over time. The manager must be a dynamic and infectious person. The last time I had a project, I had no motivation as the team owner and had to give up.

Maybe everyone's attention is different. Cheng's book mentions that people should make money for their work, rather than work for making money. This is indeed a very high level ............ This will indeed be very happy, and the efficiency will be quite high. But there are few people who can do this. As someone said, we are forced to come to this world, go to school, and take part in work ...... There are too many forced people, and few people like the current job,
Big environment. Which of the following is not the result of the big environment? There is no 'shares' in the book '.

As mentioned in the book, Mr. Cheng believes that his theory is self-explanatory. In fact, it is hard to say that things come from words are a hard-to-be-clear game. It is because you think it is right.

In the end, the book can only increase your knowledge. In the end, you still need to practice it before you can understand it. I am afraid it is only true that management can only be said.
Over the past few days, I have read Mr Cheng Junyi's "manage Three Kingdoms". A good book often gives people the desire to think about something after reading it. This book is so interesting that I want to write something now. No pen written in two or three months
Although it's spam literature, it's time to write something.

As early as three years ago, I read Master Cheng's "Three Kingdoms in boiling water". At that time, I had no feelings. I just read it as a funny novel. I have no idea when to read it.

Back to the question, "manage Three Kingdoms" focuses on two different management methods: fisherman management and gardener management. In terms of fisherman Management, Mr. Cheng believes that Cao is a good example. He knows how to use bait, fish hooks, and timing, but to some extent, it is equivalent to gambling; the example of gardener management is naturally Liu Bei. Liu Bei, like a gardener, takes care of the whole garden so that everything can grow properly. I am not a manager, not a management expert, or even an employee. I have a very short experience and I am not qualified to discuss whether this theory is correct. You can only talk about your thoughts at most.

I am still a student and a student who is about to enter the society. But what should I do? In the information age, what information can be obtained from the Internet, and how much information can be obtained from society. I feel that under the current situation, it is impossible to achieve the management of gardeners. Now it is not a "Combination" era. The management of gardeners can only be achieved by small individuals. The overall situation is just like communism, it is beyond our reach, and our enterprise does need this management method. When chatting with a few students, we often say that after finding a job, working for two years, and then finding a better company to change jobs. What's the problem?> A company has just turned you into a talent that hasn't really put you into use, so you can go to another company to serve others. Therefore, the current employer is very concerned about employee loyalty, and vaguely remembers "> Three Kingdoms" Zhuge Liang asked Liu Bei radish and big sticks to manage employees, in this section, we advocate that the company's leaders should do nothing and provide appropriate space for employees to achieve their own growth, so that they can feel the existence of managers, I feel a little conflicted. I agree with the latter.

Enterprises should create an environment, which is an enterprise culture that we can talk about. The quality of corporate culture directly affects employee loyalty. The big environment has a small impact on the environment. If there is a problem with the company's culture, there will be problems with employees'> spiritual life and psychology. Although I am not very clear, what kind of culture does Huawei have? What is the authenticity of those news reports? If, as the outside world said, the culture of "China" is indeed problematic and is a serious problem. As a manager of an enterprise, you cannot only see the benefits. An enterprise should be 'people-oriented '. Of course, people-based capital is not a long-term development method. I have not managed the company myself, but I have managed the team while working on projects in the school. Management is the knowledge of people getting along with each other. When we team up, we often think that strong cooperation is a good choice. Later, we found ourselves wrong.> A truly powerful team is a dynamic team, and a truly powerful team is a complete whole. Each team member knows what they want to do and what they can do. Strong cooperation seems good, but the team members cannot find their positions in the past, and the Team will be dispersed over time. The manager must be a dynamic and infectious person. The last time I had a project, I had no motivation as the team owner and had to give up.

Maybe everyone's attention is different. Cheng's book mentions that people should make money for their work, rather than work for making money. This is indeed a very high level ............ This will indeed be very happy, and the efficiency will be quite high. But there are few people who can do this. As someone said, we are forced to come to this world, go to school, and take part in work ...... There are too many forced people, and few people like the current job,
Big environment. Which of the following is not the result of the big environment? There is no 'shares' in the book '.

As mentioned in the book, Mr. Cheng believes that his theory is self-explanatory. In fact, it is hard to say that things come from words are a clear game. It is true that you think> is true.

In the end, the book can only increase your knowledge. In the end, you still need to practice it before you can understand it. I am afraid it is only true that management can only be said.

It's hard to say whether it's a fisherman or a gardener ............
To the end