The purpose of the system is to solve problems or alleviate problems.
Most people pursue absolute equality, and absolute equality is the use of the best, people do their duty.
Communism, the ultimate goal is to achieve absolute equality. It requires everyone to do their duty, but to create the results, we enjoy together. For example, a poor ability, with a good ability, excellent ability, a year can produce 1000 pounds of grain, and poor ability of the year can only produce 500 pounds of grain, in the same collective absolutely fair conditions, two people pay 100% of the effort, are dutifully, relative to their own pay the same much sweat, The final difference is only the difference in ability, in absolute equality should be received to 750 kilograms of food.
And the actual reality, human nature, resulting in this absolute equality can never be achieved, human nature has inertia, there is greed, when no matter how hard can not change their final results, will give up efforts, choose lazy. The production of high final capacity is getting lower and lower, and the output of low capacity is also lower. The beginning of each person can be assigned to 750 pounds, to the last person may only be allocated to 100 pounds.
Ultimately, in order to encourage production and eliminate laziness, only everyone is responsible for their own output. But has produced a new problem, the capacity of high, more than the ability to produce more than 500 kilograms of grain per year, accumulated ten years, is 5000 pounds of grain, accumulated 100 years is 50000 pounds of grain. and 50000 pounds of food need ability poor 100 years to carry out 100% of the struggle to produce, and eventually produced a gap between rich and poor. Poor ability with the ability to have a son, their son inherited the property of the father, the ability of the son, even if not work for a lifetime, can enjoy the ability of poor son 100% efforts to produce something. The gap between the rich and the poor eventually leads to imbalance, social unrest and so on.
For the innate ability to question the talent, you can observe the environment of their growth, such as school, there are always some people play games every day, classes do not listen to lectures, but each exam can always get a very good results, there are always someone to fight the life of the effort, but the final results can only reach the medium and so on. Of course, not only schools, there are all kinds of places to work, real life is full of, natural ability is a fork of the people, such as the League of Heroes, how you try to be a bronze row, the top of the last gold, and there are always a lot of people in the Diamond Row, Diamond ranked in a large proportion.
Then we go back to the system, the two seemingly fair systems, ultimately to the social distribution brought unreasonable development.
Finally what to do, take in, that is, two allocation, poor ability to create 500 pounds of grain, the ability to create a strong 1000 pounds of grain, then the ultimate ability to receive 600 pounds of grain, to the ability to receive 900 pounds of grain, in the form of tax. Just accumulate 50 years later, the ability of strong people, will still be worse than the ability of people more than 15000 pounds of grain, this is the ability of poor people need 15 years 100% struggle to get, the gap between rich and poor will still accompany with the time, inevitable. But the society has developed better, everyone's labor force has been mobilized, although can not solve the problem, but alleviate the problem.
Of course, if the whole world is only farmers, do not need other types of work, then look at the problem will be much simpler, more easily see the reason, but the society is so complex, so various problems entangled, more complex, but the essence is still this problem, how to solve the problem of the distribution of genius and ordinary people, how to allocate justice will not affect social And the system is the collective to solve the distribution of the product of the emergence.
None of the existing systems is able to solve the problem perfectly. In addition to same big pot No system can be perfect to avoid this problem, that is, all the existing system, will lead to the gap between the rich and the unlimited expansion over time.
Every system has its execution environment, the execution environment is different, the final result is different, there will be a variety of changes.
A system, not simply to see if it sounds good, but to see if it is applicable to the current environment, whether it can be carried out. Can be carried out is good, do not go down or the implementation of the change taste, it is not the same. For example: Officials transparent property, everyone is human, people are sex, officials are just a profession, do not think that everyone has very high value and integrity, think poetry can replace eating, assuming that in the beginning, not greedy to stay in officialdom, it may be greedy, and then you ask to publish transparent official property, then transparent, It is tantamount to confessing their greed, all the officials themselves certainly do not do, all oppose, the overall strike, riot, certainly not. The extreme may have extinguished the first to put forward this system of people, want to improve only to prevent them later, not greedy on the line, solve a few typical, and then the past, then the crackdown, the whole can become better. For this particular collective, then property transparency is certainly not a good system, in order to improve the overall environment must be comprehensive consideration of the current environment.
A little more image, at the beginning to conquer, gathered a bunch of people, for others to do their own good work, must be a good promise, then I have meat to eat and drink. And so the world hit down, can count on a group of people who have the right to kill a good self-control, law-abiding, waiting for the people like son. But justify Tusigoupeng, the bottom man will destroy you. Only on the existing basis, a little bit of adding system, imperceptible, let a group of people accustomed to the law to become a law-abiding citizen. Can not be too hard at once, or cause rebound, can not be held to their black history, or cause rebound, can follow you to leave to the end is certainly also smart. It takes a long time to transition to a group of people who are good at fighting and to become law-abiding citizens, and to allow this group of people to gain benefits and to abide by existing rules.
As for the people ruled, from the history of human thousands of years, not very optimistic. Managers only consider the existing situation, will not lead to the entire collective collapse, the whole collective if there is a crisis, the existing people can win the war continue to the upper.
Custom a good system, very difficult, need to weigh the interests of the majority of people, but also to maintain the overall stable development, stable development, and can accumulate more food, used to allocate relief contradictions.
Purely for the system, a good system is the most suitable for the current environment, can solve the problem, or can alleviate the problem of the system. Unless the contradiction eventually accumulates to be unable to be relieved again, the direct eruption, everything again starts from scratch. Even after starting from scratch, before the perfect system to solve the problem, it will eventually begin to face various problems.
What kind of system is a good system