16.4.9 Face document number, view document entry
This is what verse 16.1 says. There are 2 kinds of situations:
The face is "father" number, too good, the mouse pointing to the number, you see (like 9.2.10.3, Figure 9 5)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, please click on the "child" number → will automatically jump to the "parent" number → see → read it? Okay, click here.
Return to the "sub" number--what
Can't find it? Alas, I said to "decorate" the.
16.4.10 Face document entry, return document number
This is what verse 16.1 says. Click on the document entry → Click "Return body Button"--a little regret: only return the "parent" number. However, this regret is inevitable! For the reasons, see section 16.3.9.
16.4.11 Automatic Revision number
When the "parent" number is added/deleted/moved forward/later, the "parent" number is changed automatically, but the "child" number does not change! Do we have to revise our numbers?--Don't worry:, please click on the "Revision number button", this 1-hit, will be done a lot, many operations!
And, if you delete a "parent" number, you will automatically jump to the wrong "sub" number there, waiting for you to delete it
Otherwise, everything's OK:
16.4.12 to separate documents
Since the essence of this law is endnotes, the default "body and endnote Separation mode" is shown in Figure 16, 11 of the left. This is clearly not a requirement. Please click on the "Change Document separator button", this hit, will automatically do many, many, many operations, and finally realize the figure 16 11 right.
Figure 16 11 Change the document separation
I'm going to add this button by default, "References" will be added as a page. If you need "reference continuation of the text at the end of", please (with the treasure mirror to take a photo → Under the guidance of the Mirror) delete the page break.
16.4.13 from one numbering mode to another
This is 16.1 section said, hehe, hehe, in Vain (byebye): (Please out of your omnipotent hands).
16.4.14 removal of Automatic
This is the 16.1 section of the said, oh, since the adoption of the "Endnote + cross-reference" strategy, it is necessary to clear the automatic sex?
16.4.15 Other advanced operations
Not to mention, I have some other small action, for example, I use "macro" to find the number, the value of the general, do not introduce.
16.4.16 current deficiencies, flaws, hidden dangers
The lack of responsibility--I am negative--is not fully automated, sometimes need to be supplemented by manual operations, such as: Add a comma, delete a number, has not achieved "lazy through" the goal:.
The flaws of existence--the responsibility is negative to me--as described in section 16.3.14.
There is a hidden danger--no sense:, or, "not from a numbering mode automatically to another" can be considered a hidden danger.
It is highly recommended that the new features of Word 2007 be recommended as long as your industry's documentation requirements conform to the standards that Word provides (see in reference-style)! My little gadget is mostly my own treasure:.
16.4.171 Points Supplementary note
If you have a manual document number already in your article, the automatic numbering created using the above method cannot be integrated with those manual numbers! In other words: The original "Manual numbering system" can not automatically convert to the "Automatic numbering system", the "Manual numbering system" can only continue to hand-processed, or, Delete all manual numbers and set up the automatic numbering system from the beginning.
16.4.18 the summary of my experience
Oh, I love my little baby:! And even if word "citations and bibliographies" were better, I wouldn't throw away my little baby--because, as many of my previous notes and manuscripts have been set up to document numbering, are they all converted into "citation and bibliography" mode? You're not tired of me! unless, Word adds the "Endnote conversion to citation" feature! (Expected 500 years later:?)