Hash consistency algorithm

Read Catalogue

• 1 Basic Scenarios
• 2 hash Algorithm and monotonicity
• Principle of the 3 consistent hashing algorithm
• 4 Virtual nodes
• 5 Summary

Back to top 1 basic scenes

For example, if you have n cache server (hereafter referred to as cache), then how to map an object to n cache, you are likely to use a common method like the following to calculate the hash value of object, and then map evenly to the n cache;

Hash (object)%N

Everything is running normally, consider the following two cases;

11 Cache server M down (this must be considered in the actual application) so that all objects mapped to the cache m will be invalidated, what to do, need to remove the cache m from the cache, when the cache is N-1, the mapping formula becomes HA Sh (object)% (N-1);

2 because of the access aggravating, need to add the cache, this time the cache is n+1, mapping formula into a hash (object)% (n+1);

What does 1 and 2 mean? This means that suddenly almost all of the caches are dead. For the server, this is a disaster, flood-like access will be directly rushed back to the server;

Consider the third problem, because the hardware capabilities are getting stronger, you may want to add more nodes to do more work, obviously the above hash algorithm can not be done.

Is there any way to change this situation, this is consistent hashing ...

Back to top 2 hash algorithm and monotonicity

A measure of the Hash algorithm is monotonicity (monotonicity), which is defined as follows:

Monotonicity refers to the addition of a new buffer to the system if some content has been allocated to the corresponding buffer by hashing. The result of the hash should be to ensure that the original allocated content can be mapped to a new buffer without being mapped to another buffer in the old buffer collection.

Easy to see, above the simple hash algorithm hash (object)%N difficult to meet the monotonicity requirements.

Back to top 3 consistent the principle of hashing algorithm

Consistent hashing is a hash algorithm, in a nutshell, when removing/adding a cache, it can change the existing key mappings as small as possible, and satisfy the monotonic requirements as much as necessary.

Here are the basic principles of the consistent hashing algorithm in 5 steps.

3.1 Ring Hash Space

Consider that the usual hash algorithm is to map value to a key value of 32, which is the value space of the 0~2^32-1; we can think of this space as a ring with a first (0) tail (2^32-1), as shown in Figure 1 below.

H

Figure 1 Ring Hash space

3.2 Mapping objects to the hash space

Next consider 4 objects Object1~object4, the hash function calculated by the hash value of key on the ring distribution 2 is shown.

Hash (object1) = Key1;

... ...

Hash (OBJECT4) = Key4;

Figure 2 Key value distributions for 4 objects

3.3 Mapping the cache to the hash space

The basic idea of consistent hashing is to map both the object and the cache to the same hash value space, and use the same hash algorithm.

Assuming that there are currently a A, a, a and C a total of 3 caches, then its mapping results will be 3, they are in the hash space, the corresponding hash value arrangement.

Hash (cache a) = key A;

... ...

Hash (cache c) = key C;

Figure 3 Key value distributions for cache and objects

Speaking of which, by the way, the cache hash calculation, the general method can use the cache machine's IP address or machine name as a hash input.

3.4 Mapping objects to the cache

Now that both the cache and the object have been mapped to the hash value space using the same hash algorithm, the next thing to consider is how to map the object to the cache.

In this annular space, if you start from the object's key value in a clockwise direction until you meet a cache, the object is stored on the cache because the hash value of the object and cache is fixed, so the cache must be unique and deterministic. Did you find the mapping method for the object and cache?!

Continue with the above example (see Figure 3), then, according to the above method, the object Object1 will be stored on cache A; Object2 and object3 correspond to cache C; Object4 corresponds to cache B;

3.5 Review the change of the cache

Said before, through the hash and then the method of redundancy is the biggest problem is not to meet the monotony, when the cache changes, the cache will fail, and then the background server caused a huge impact, now to analyze and analyze the consistent hashing algorithm.

3.5.1 Remove Cache

Consider the assumption that cache B hangs up, and according to the mapping method described above, the only objects that will be affected are those that go counterclockwise through cache B until the next cache (cache A), that is, those objects that would have been mapped to cache B.

So here you only need to change the object Object4 and remap it to cache C; see Figure 4.

Figure 4 Cache Map after cache B has been removed

3.5.2 Add Cache

Consider the case of adding a new cache D, assuming that in this ring hash space, cache D is mapped between the object Object2 and Object3. The only things that will be affected are those objects that traverse the cache D counterclockwise until the next cache (cache B), which is also mapped to a portion of the object on cache C, to remap the objects to cache d.

So here you only need to change the object object2 and remap it to cache D; see Figure 5.

Figure 5 Mapping relationships after adding cache D

Back to top 4 virtual node

Another indicator for considering the Hash algorithm is the balance (Balance), which is defined as follows:

Balance of

Balance means that the result of the hash can be distributed to all buffers as much as possible, thus allowing all buffer space to be exploited.

Hash algorithm is not guaranteed absolute balance, if the cache is less, the object can not be evenly mapped to the cache, such as in the above example, only the deployment of cache A and cache C, in 4 objects, cache a only stored object1, Cache C Stores Object2, Object3, and Object4, and the distributions are very uneven.

To solve this situation, consistent hashing introduces the concept of "virtual node", which can be defined as follows:

Virtual node is the actual node in the hash space of the replica (replica), a real node corresponding to a number of "virtual node", the corresponding number has become "Replication Number", "Virtual node" in the hash space in the hash value.

In the case of deploying only cache A and cache C, we have seen in Figure 4 that the cache distribution is not uniform. Now we introduce the virtual node, and set the "number of copies" to 2, which means there will be 4 "virtual nodes", the cache A1, cache A2 represents the cache A; Cache C1, Cache C2 represents the cache C; Suppose a more ideal situation See Figure 6.

6 mapping relationship after introduction of "Virtual Node"

At this point, the mapping of the object to the virtual node is:

Objec1->cache A2; objec2->cache A1; Objec3->cache C1; Objec4->cache C2;

So objects Object1 and Object2 are mapped to cache a, and object3 and Object4 are mapped to cache C; The balance has improved a lot.

After the "Virtual node" is introduced, the mapping relationship is transformed from {object---node} to {Object-and-virtual node}. The mapping relationship 7 is shown when querying the cache of an object.

Figure 7 The cache where the object is queried

The hash calculation of "virtual node" can be based on the IP address of the corresponding node plus the number suffix. For example, assume that the IP address of Cache A is 202.168.14.241.

Before introducing "Virtual node", calculate the hash value of cache A:

Hash ("202.168.14.241");

After introducing "virtual node", compute the hash value of the "virtual section" point cache A1 and cache A2:

Hash ("202.168.14.241#1"); Cache A1

Hash ("202.168.14.241#2"); Cache A2

Back to Top 5 summary

The basic principle of consistent hashing is these, the specific distribution of such theoretical analysis should be very complex, but generally not used.

Http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2007/11/27/consistent-hashing above has a Java version of the example, you can refer to.

Http://blog.csdn.net/mayongzhan/archive/2009/06/25/4298834.aspx reproduced a PHP version of the implementation code.

Http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/lib-conhash.aspx C language version

Some reference addresses:

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=258660

Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing

http://www.spiteful.com/2008/03/17/programmers-toolbox-part-3-consistent-hashing/

Http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2007/11/27/consistent-hashing

http://tech.idv2.com/2008/07/24/memcached-004/

Http://blog.csdn.net/mayongzhan/archive/2009/06/25/4298834.aspx

Transferred from: http://blog.csdn.net/sparkliang/article/details/5279393

Hash consistency algorithm