Invalid s On the question, "Why do you go back to life after a lot of books have been read?" "In the reply

Original address: http://www.zhihu.com/question/28230169

That year, the popularity of StarCraft, boys almost no play, and I, although the level is not good, but in the vicinity of the Internet bar is no one can beat, other schools are running to challenge, but also I and a few friends to call back, so in the same class several classes called Master. So the man came to ask--with a thick notebook.


This person is really very diligent, and very very practical.

He starts with the StarCraft menu, starts the game, points out which one of the soldiers is in the book (This is what he consults with others), and then asks carefully what the primary soldier is in each race, what building it is, what the middle class prerequisites are, how it is made ... And the attack and defense of each class, strengths, weaknesses, upgrades and so on, and so on, recorded a large book. And then every day, holding a notebook back ... After the end of the casually grab a person, let him take the book question, he answered, see answer is right.


After the class information is back down, he asked how to start, start with several stereotypes, and so on, and so on, and then the economy, operations, micro-and so on ... Then, I play against other people, he stood next to watch, while looking at one side to ask why ...


In this way, he studied for a year.


What about the effect?

So to speak, a few classes, as long as it is playing in the Internet cafes and people to fight, there is a count, all can amputated him ...



Why?
Did I hide settle? Or did he learn to be less practical? Or is my theory all wrong? So how do I get invincible in a few classes?


Basic no problem, the theory is not a problem, how to learn a year, or a rookie?


————————————————————————————

In fact, the first day he came to ask me, I gave him the advice is: Throw away the notebook, we first go to the Internet cafes. I'll tell you what to do after I finish the fight.

He turned it down.


Then, one months later, I told him, if you are playing in the Internet café this month, two innings a day, one months 60 innings, I guarantee you hit the middle level in the class. What do you think? To the Internet bar?

He still refused.


1.5 months later, another is my various amputated but to run the Internet cafes beating still bored rookie, already can and class in the top five a master dozen of the vivid.

But he still stubbornly notes, back theory ...


So, a year later, he gave up.

————————————————————————————

Why?

The theory is good, but it's not your theory. You think you understand, in fact ... You just recite some seemingly superficial spells.



To really understand a truth, at least three levels.

First level: what is
"What" is the literal meaning of the understanding. A lot of people, a word, know each other and make up a sentence ... Don't understand.
The understanding of the literal meaning is the foundation of all, but it is only a foundation.
--You feel it, and then it becomes irrelevant, which means you just understand the literal meaning of the text.

For example, I told the classmate to play StarCraft, and to use the resources mined for the first time. Or become a soldier, or become a building, or become a technology, in short, must not let the resources backlog-for example, Master Battle, Crystal (a resource in the game, the equivalent of money) will never backlog more than 2, 300, unless his next thing to make more crystal.

He understood all of a sudden. So he only uses 6 farmers to mine--or there are too many crystals.


Similarly, the economy of western developed countries, industry and agriculture has a price scissors, so our country has established a basic national policy, that is, to formulate policies to forcibly maintain industrial and agricultural price scissors.

The same 2 goods.

A second level: why
Why did the author make such a conclusion? What difficulties did he encounter? What inspired him? What's the deal? How to prove the solution works? How do I exclude competition (proving that the solution is optimal or better)?
--To learn this level, to do the relevant specific matters, it is probably a little organized, at least not like the first level of 2X, but far from comprehend by analogy, improvise.

Also take StarCraft resources for example.

Why should I tell him that the resources must not be kept in the backlog?

Because the resources are dead. If the base is flattened, you have 100,000 of the resources, but it's just a number.

But if you make it a farmer, the speed of your mining will increase exponentially, and then the very high mining rate will allow you to quickly start out with a team of soldiers or quickly climb a key technology, enough to suppress the position, the strength/technology advantage can protect you to open a second mine, a third mine ...

-resource-driven force and technology, technology and force are the foundations for more resources, more resources, more resources and more technological advantages ...
--This growth is a geometric series. So the resource utilization efficiency is very very important, the early period of a little delay will be magnified, and even lead to failure.

But he only understood the literal meaning-not to allow too many crystals.
So he only used 6 farmers to mine.

Eventually, when he finally choked out the two teams of junior soldiers, I had all the other mines on the map accounted for, more than 10 sub-bases combined with nearly 100 farmers mining.
This high he more than 10 times times the resource collection efficiency, can let me in the same time, easily built barracks dozens of, the airport more than 10. At this time, my first big ship has surrounded him, second, the Third fleet is in more than 10 airports at the same time to start manufacturing (know his level, I choose a higher population model) ...




Similarly, the foreign industry and agriculture price scissors, because agricultural products are similar raw materials, unlike industrial goods can add more value, so the market price rise rate is lower than the industrial product, both sides of the difference is growing-the mechanization of agricultural production is more and more high, scale, production costs are also getting lower.

The domestic price scissors, by forcing down the price to suppress the rural economy, in essence, plundering the countryside, to curb its development, so that it and industrial development speed difference.

As a result, the policy has brought down the rural economy (just overshadowed by the growth of the 7x ERA), tying nearly 80% of the population to land and dragging it near the extreme poverty line.

This essentially destroys 80% of the country's markets. Therefore, the lack of industrial products market, the subsequent weakness, can not afford large enterprises, and eventually seriously slow down the pace of development (consider the 1 billion-scale market and 200 million-scale market, the difference will be how big it).



Do not know why, even may literally mean "understand" the more, cause the more serious harm. Because it is all understood as sophistry.

Third level: Why could he
Why did the author think of it, and I couldn't imagine it?
We read, not to worship the author, but to learn from the lessons of our predecessors and ultimately to surpass him.

go on, StarCraft.

We all play StarCraft, but why some people can find so many rules and effective use, and some people not only can't find the law, and even others find to teach him, he can also rote into sophistry?

How on earth did they do it? How is this ability cultivated?

If you can't learn this ability, how can you beat someone with that ability? Otherwise, you are the people have learned everything, how do you know that they will not be on the spot to you a improvise?

And, unlike hard science books filled with dry goods, such books as psychology, water is very large; Life sentiment is almost all water.

This leads to, this kind of book, theory is a semi-finished, and even various statements contradict each other; practice? That is the practice of others.

When he gives you his psychological judgment how much spirit, perhaps quietly hid a lot of judgment mistakes front fool case; even if he is right, the reason is not necessarily the reason he said, but because he saw the other, did not reveal in the book details.

Therefore, to see this book, but also to try to understand the third layer, digging out the author himself may not be able to express his words accurately, his real ideas.

Especially literature books, full of paper absurd words, a bitter tears, all cloud author crazy, who the flavor of the solution? The reader's own life experience is very, very important, almost impossible to "solve" the "flavor".

——————————————————————————

The paper came to the end of the light, I know this matter to preach.

Even if it is a simple StarCraft, the theories and practices that have been heard are so big that the complex theories, and the basic theories they rely on, do not know how many hands have been turned.

Do not put this gap to fill up, just read, feel understand, it is only the most shallow level of "literal understanding" just.


--I've seen a lot of people, theory back very slip, on the spot a mess. They all just "literally understand".
-even in our tradition, textbooks must be marked out with bold words. The back of these, the test score is higher, but also even "literally understand" did not do.

——————————————————————————

Often some people say that reading to the fine, need to " read more thin ", in fact, the same truth:

When you just literally understand, nature can only try to memorize a thick book, and then ... In the erosion of the years to forget ...

And when you understand why, you just need to remember a few key points, plus it may be a few pages to more than 10 pages of the appearance-probably the Chinese textbook in boldface content (but, if you understand why.) Otherwise it's better to recite the whole book)--and then forget it at a slower pace.

Finally, when you thoroughly grasp the essence, in this area of knowledge, close to or even reach the level of the author, the whole book has become a few words or a few guiding principles-from now on, even if the specific words have been forgotten, but always in the expression between the gestures.

At this stage, a thick book? Really understand the essence of, can on the spot by these words, a few guiding principles for you to play a more thick one out.

Just like playing StarCraft, the ever-changing game situation is simply impossible to memorize, and the logic loops in the brain of the person you are fighting with cannot make you understand everything, and it is impossible to memorized.

But, as long as it really plays, no matter how complicated the game is, no matter how big the opponent's brain hole is, you know what to do, you can guess his heart, and even induce him to go into the trap-not playing, it's impossible to understand.

————————————————————————

Not only this.

I mentioned the concept of "local knowledge domain": The menu of StarCraft is a part; A class is a part; The Science tree is a part; The operation is a part ...

knowledge is three-dimensional .

So, every part, you can read "thin" in a similar way, and then, when I talk about bigger picture, analyzing a situation, I will not go into a detail, and you, if there is no "read Thin local" This foundation , it is impossible to follow my thinking on this topic .

-Obviously, when you're still in the "don't let the backlog of resources, is to make less farmers, or to spend the money as soon as possible," the low-level stage; hear me say "no, he didn't open the base, how is it so soldiers of?" Must be climbing technology ... Let me see...... Well, it's obvious that he must have come up with a golden shade of Me "when you are absolutely listening to the heavenly book."

If you remember the small book: "The game played in the early stage, did not open sub-base, soldiers are very few, is in the making of the Golden Bug"--well, this sentence is I said, very simple, everyone understand.

But it's wrong.

I'm still right when I say it, you're wrong to write it down.

This is somewhat similar to the mental and literary categories mentioned earlier: According to my experience/theory, I think his current building, troop size and normal difference, so judge him in the science and technology class, this is the theory; but judging that he is making a golden bug, it is likely to see something else: or his barracks/airport is not shining, Or the discovery of a few of the transport planes he hid in the corner, and the factory where he built the transporter was still flashing, which was a comprehensive application of the theory.

Therefore, it is necessary to digest the theory of low-level knowledge in local units, and it is possible to keep up with the rhythm and learn the higher-order theory based on them. Rote memorization is only suitable for the field of knowledge that is flat and does not need to be "moved" or "used up".

basic knowledge is not fully mastered, with cooked rice, is absolutely not able to master the advanced subject .

—————————————————————————

Abstract theory is more easy to play and deduce in practice, and the higher-order theory can guide practice in turn, and better practice revises and develops even sublimation theory ...

The development of theory is so difficult, learning to think by the words of the memory of one step? Oh.

Avenue to Jane, but want to won the three taste, you have to walk in the red dust in a back.

Otherwise, the back more than once, is just a mantra.

The

word " mantra " is derived from Buddhist zen, meaning that it does not mean to comprehend, but to put some off-the-shelf experience in the oral, pretending to have thought, self-thought to understand the truth of Zen, is listed in the wrong way of Zen.

(turn) Invalid s On the question "Why do you go back to life after a lot of books have been read?" "In the reply