(Formerly known as Windows Presentation Foundation) (. NET)

It has always been assumed that. NET 3.0 is still very popular, and. NET 2.0 is still not broken. What kind of. NET 3.0? But what about WPF Now? After this article, I was shocked and confused. Why?

After seeing the RIA and vector technology, I probably know what WPF wants to adjust. If I guess there is no problem, this change will be the same as COM to. NET, and it will be a big change in microservices.

Let's take a look at the Flash technology. It is not only dazzling, but also has a small number of cases and does not require PostBack. Moreover, Flash programs can be used on desktop platforms and Web platforms at the same time, that is to say, a program can run on various platforms at the same time as long as it is renewed once, including desktop systems and Web, and even mobile phones, Linux and Mac.

What about the current. NET ?. NET technology is currently divided into two groups, ASP. NET and WinForm, although the current two programming methods are very similar, but it cannot be recognized, the program still needs to be re-developed, and cannot run the two platforms at the same time. And ASP. NET technology requires a large number of PostBack, not only looks uncomfortable, but also is a good technical support, although AJAX, Atalas Framwork and other technical support, however, the technical nature of HTML-Based remains unchanged. HTML-Based scripting and program exposure are not easy to typeset, in fact, I have never liked HTML for a long time, and HTML is not intended to be used as a program interface. Originally, I only wanted to display the program metadata, however, in this way, the ads have become the front-end of the dynamic Web hosting technology. I have always hoped that a new technology can replace HTML, and microservices have worked hard, activeDocument can be developed in the COM era, VB6, Visual C ++, VFP6, and Delphi. It is still a Windows program, and can be written on IE, in the original Windows program, you only need to modify it a little, but unfortunately, ActiveDocument has not been successful. I think its biggest problem is that ActiveDocument program has a large number of programming cases, the memory usage exceeds 1 MB, which is slow. The Internet hosting of the fast-paced network is powerful, and its reliability is not high. Anti-compaction Flash, due to the success of vector technology, the Flash attack case is much smaller, so of course it will succeed.

Just a few years ago, on the internet, I was able to launch a new vector technology called Flash Killer. Unfortunately, I only wanted to upgrade the ladder, I have never seen a specific product, and Adobe/Macromedia releases the Flex 2.0, which I guess is also quite powerful for microservices, after all, this Server Side Flash has a big headache for programming. As long as the Server Side is available, the data terminal is easy to solve, in addition to the rich user interface of RIA, I guess many programming languages should change over.

Therefore, I think that the introduction of WPF by microservices also represents the long-term achievements of deep training in vector technology, it is also a response technique that has to be proposed by Flex's RIA technology. Many people complain. NET 2.0 does not last long and has not been learned yet ,. NET 3.0 is coming again, but I guess WPF should not be here. NET, it will make WPF. NET 3.0, which should be determined by Marketing. In short, this is a technical example of micro-segmentation.

What effect does WPF have on programming? Simply put, 70% of students need to study again. In the data access part, the distributed component part should not change, but the parts related to the UI should all be re-learned. Actually, it is a brand new vector technology, and ASP. NET and WinForm are completely different. However, if you use a WPF platform program, you can run it on the desktop platform and Web at the same time only once.

I remember that in the past TechEd time, I said that the NET technology should be able to be used for 10 years. Now, it seems that this vector technology is completely used, although the name is still.. NET, but it already follows the original. NET is much worse, although it does not change like COM. NET, but it is almost a big change.

So I was shocked by the following ,. NET 2.0 has not been studied yet ,. NET 3.0 is coming soon, and it is still a major change. what we hope is that the long-awaited vector technology could replace the HTML technology. I have been waiting for a long time this day.