Fudan University Open Class: An artificial intelligence philosophy note

Fudan University Open Class: The philosophy of artificial intelligence
I learn to understand

1 Why the science of artificial intelligence needs philosophical participation

Artificial Intelligence and philosophy, the definition of their own and research direction is very special,
The knowledge of intelligence is in itself a deeper understanding of man's wisdom.
Philosophy is the study of people and the world, so there is a guiding role or mutual development

2 modern European philosophy and artificial intelligence
This paper introduces the views of modern European philosophers on AI, and the teacher gives us a dialectical way to
There is a process to understand the development of philosophy and artificial intelligence
There is a dialectical rhetorical question about rationality, sensibility, mathematics, logic, and intelligence in the end artificial intelligence
Whether it can be achieved, finally, the statistics and the coupling of AI, bio-neural AI

3 Kant, analogical reasoning and "Tiger"
Hugh is empiricism, and it's achieved with statistics.
Mo calculus is absolute rationalism, such as: the realization of the analogy pattern, to achieve
What does Kant's philosophy inspire to engineering?
Perceptual level to the level of imagination to the understanding of the two-way feedback
Thought and its embodiment, engineering practice thought

4 Chinese Character House argumentation

The teacher uses internal introspection or external behavior two possible, to determine the house of people
Whether intelligent, to disprove the 7th, "assume that the system through the Chinese test, the people also do not understand Chinese"

8a introspection does not understand Chinese 8b external test to determine if the test is not Chinese can be set up seven
and the 3rd: external behavior can not determine whether to understand Chinese
6th: The internal test does not exist the ability to think, there is no intelligence, only the executive program is intelligent

Because the 8AB is the premise of the back, so 8 does not set up, so 7 does not set up

NetEase Netizens said, the 7th less likely two words, yes, the subjects may not understand Chinese.

I do not agree with the author's conclusion that the Chinese character House experiment, because,

Can abstract house people for a People B dog C transfer automation D similar to the operation of the transfer card operation

In fact, the real decision whether to understand Chinese is the rule, if a ' do not understand Chinese ' rules, people outside easy to think inside
People do not understand Chinese, but it is difficult to distinguish

So, whether people in the house can speak Chinese, English, or do not understand the language, and even other species will not affect the experiment, the real impact is
Rules! Perhaps it is a Chinese person's smart choice of the corresponding card!

The author is right that its experiments do not determine whether the people in the House will speak, and the House people do not need to understand the semantics can let the Outsiders think
People in the House can speak Chinese!
And the wrong is, in this experiment, can let the outsiders think that the house people will Chinese, the choice of rules must be understood semantics!
and this understanding semantics [object rule] and the author does not need to understand the semantics of the computer [object person] can make [object rules] will be Chinese but no intelligent [object person] contrary!
So the author is limited! Logic and objects are moving!

5 Wittgenstein, "Color incompatibility", framing problems and bomb-removal robots
Don't quite understand

Welcome to comment, Exchange

Fudan University Open Class: An artificial intelligence philosophy note