[Full-Process Modeling] thoughts on Xu fengxiong's full-Process Modeling Implementation of Software Engineering

First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to the Technical Support Team for your prompt speech. The boy received this article today and responded accordingly.
1) many of my friends mentioned the issue. As for projects, people with experience in similar industries should be able to see which projects belong.
To be honest, the kiddies do not dare to use a complete project. Otherwise, some companies will definitely ask me to settle their bills.
All the pictures in the book are modified, which is slightly simpler than the source image, but should be enough to explain the problem.
Of course, perfect combination is impossible. This is not the word I want to add. It is estimated that it is the consideration of artists or e-society planners. I apologize to all my friends for this.
2) I am mainly talking about methods in this book. I personally think that is the so-called methodology, rather than the engineering process, because different projects have different management modes, different user objects, different user requirements, and industry characteristics, there are too many differences. I think it can be written for specific consideration, there is only a method, but no process-this is what kiddies have always said. Therefore, the operation steps are necessary. We hope that after reading the book, you can perform some exploration on your own Based on the content in the book.
3) I don't quite understand this, so it's hard to talk about it more. If you have any questions, please go to my blog or csdn's soft work section and submit them separately.
4) This may be because the kid doesn't know how to write a book. Many people have said that I should want to learn from Mr. Li Wei. However, after all, I have limited energy and can only hope that I can do better after I enrich the content.

Your questions:
1) Interactive modeling refers to the refinement of case description in the presentation layer. It can assist in the analysis model because it directly completes the user's operations and the direct reflection process of the system.
2) kiddie believes that the domain model and business model should belong to the business modeling field, not to the scope of the analytical model or rational analysis model described by kiddie.
3) There may be too many pattern problems. However, I think that the gof pattern is mostly at the encoding layer. However, if it is applied, you cannot solve your business problems either, what he can provide is a method on the abstract layer. You must select the correct mode to solve similar problems. Therefore, this is the same as the document template and mathematical formula.
Maybe the kid understands that there are some deviations. I hope you will give me some advice.
4) concerning the design of the basic framework, I personally think This is formed in the process of guiding the design of the architecture and extracted after the design, even if it is the JDBC connection implementation, it is only the implementation of the connection method in the implementation class in the background. These are common to some extent, or are part of reusable components.
In the future, I personally think thatCodeLibrary for better support, that is, in the future, there is no need to manually participate in the re-encoding part of the MDA.

I don't know whether the above content is answered completely. You are welcome to criticize and correct me.