Game Search engine rules: Collection really not to take?

SEO optimization process in the original content is the most beneficial to the search engine optimization rules of the method, an original site, even if the structural optimization is mediocre, will still get the favor of search engines. Even in the long-term content construction, can accumulate a high enough rankings. However, the original content of the update is often said to be easy to do difficult, especially high-quality content is more difficult to ask. So for small and medium-sized websites, most of the sites are more or less used to collect, to enrich the content of the site. However, the search engine does not like "collection" A word, collection is only used for a while, do not have a long-term collection. But is collecting really not good for website optimization? In fact, the collection can also be beneficial to the optimization of the site, the following into today's business:

One: Why does it say that the gathering station does not live long

Website optimization has too many sites for collection, and even a set of acquisition software can sell hundreds of yuan price. The emergence of CMS for the construction of the site to build an easy journey to build a station, but also achieved the acquisition of the derivation and overflow. Take now A5 article, when releasing an article, few will be collected dozens of times, some articles can be collected hundreds of times. Thus creating the same content of a high degree of duplication and overflow, search engine for cleaning up redundancy, the end will be some site collection and do culling and punishment. As a result, some sites are collected after collection, but the more content gathered also accelerated the speed of death of the site, for this is obvious to all the facts. However, in retrospect, other people's hard work to get the original search engine to give a bit of electricity weight, if the collection station is still so, is it too unfair? The collection station does not live long, it is also recognized by people.

Second: How to make the collection also fruitful

In the Internet every day has a lot of collection information, but also include some large news sites easily in it. But why should it be included in the search engine's news sources when it is updated? Search engine is not disgust collection? In fact, search engines are not completely disgusted with the collection, in the collection, search engine to avoid is a high "repeat" content of the appearance. Thus avoiding a high "repetition" is not feasible? Many sites are also collected, and even in the process of collection and optimization, the weight of the site is also in the gradual promotion. Why does the search engine support such a collection? A website has a limited number of users, but if the content is limited to one site, how can more users see the same resource information? The sharing of resources in the Internet is still immutable and cannot be changed. But the acquisition is not limited to the timing of the GRASP, high-quality content is the impact of the site to collect the weight of one. How does a search engine judge the quality of content? Machines are, after all, just a set of procedures. However, the binary system that the search engine can still be through the content of the number of words, language is fluent, to discriminate the merits or demerits of the content.

Third: The collection weight is higher than false original

Pseudo original, many stationmaster can't go out of paradise, always think false original is the easiest and most popular search engine favored article import law. After finding an article, after a simple change in content, it can be used to deceive the search engine as a collection of original content. But the search engine really can't recognize as original? Many sites in the initial collection of good results, but later but "unprovoked" by K, a large number of false original is the root cause of the right to be induced down. Why is the weight of the collection higher than the false original? Search engine focus on copyright, this is a lot of seoer think so, collect high-quality resources, in the subsequent labeling a "copyright notice", such a page is more popular search engine like. Respect for others, you can gain more respect. A reasonable collection every day, not hasty, selective collection of resources, search engines will be more like. and the creation of false original, more easily dilute the author's own ideas, users read the useless, specifically feed spider things, search engines do not like.

Conclusion: Binary network work together with Beijing SEO (www.seostudy.org) that: collection is not desirable, but the traditional view, how many sites because of collection and to the right track? For this, I believe there are many webmaster deep experience. But the author is not advocating webmaster collection, reasonable optimization site needs original and collection of organic combination, so do optimization, search engine is more favored.