Group self-assessment, mutual evaluation and feedback

Group self-assessment, mutual evaluation and feedback

1, the Group Mutual Evaluation:

Funny group: The Charter is suitable for campus, especially the university, the interface design is good, the workload is more.

Spiritual Enlightenment: There is no front-desk effect, but they have a lot of work. Just a little improvement.

Little monster: The frame has come out, on the interface and backstage some things, the progress is also relatively good.

Noah's Ark: a clear division of labor, more ideas, the progress of the completion of a better.

Newapps: They do the current is quite good, generated the mobile app, the interface is also good. Together pal: Overall also good, still need to work hard.

Surprisingly: The workload of two people is still quite a lot, the function also needs a lot of innovation.

Copyer: Too concise picture, no specific content.

Snow: The app's out of bounds have not seen, it is more regrettable.

Dream Wings: Teamwork is very successful, very serious, is the leader of the group, but the specific content still needs to be improved.

2. Self-assessment within the group:

There are 5 people in our group, but the division of labor is not too clear, perhaps because everyone has more work, the progress slowed down. Our interface is relatively concise, but a lot of work, the framework is generally good. Teamwork or need more in-run, a lot of cohesion team cooperation, not too scattered.

3. Fractional distribution

Wu Wei 5

Liao Ho 4

Triumph 3

Liu Chengdong 2

Ma Zhilei 1

Group self-assessment, mutual evaluation and feedback